S. Kumaravel vs Aparajith (Died) and Legal Heir Father E.Kangaraj — 70/2023

Case under Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 Section 166(1). Status: Evidence. Next hearing: 16th March 2026.

MCOP - Motor Accidents Claim Original Petition

CNR: TNTI210002692023

Evidence

Next Hearing

16th March 2026

Filing Number

270/2023

Filing Date

20-03-2023

Registration No

70/2023

Registration Date

05-04-2023

Court

Sub Court, Palladam

Judge

1-Subordinate Judge

Acts & Sections

Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 Section 166(1)
Ia/3/2025 Classification : Petition to Set-aside Exparte Order or Decree Section S. Kumaravel

Petitioner(s)

S. Kumaravel

Adv. Lawrance R

Respondent(s)

Aparajith (Died) and Legal Heir Father E.Kangaraj

The Branch Manager, United India Insurance co ltd.,

Hearing History

Judge: 1-Subordinate Judge

05-03-2026

Evidence

26-02-2026

Appearance

04-02-2026

Evidence

20-01-2026

Evidence

11-12-2025

Evidence

Interim Orders

05-03-2026
Copy of Deposition

A witness (Mansoor Ali), an Assistant Inspector from Karamathampatti Police Station, testified in MCOP No. 70/2023 before the Subordinate Court, Palladam on March 5, 2026, regarding FIR No. 588/2022. The witness provided evidence that a case was registered against the vehicle TN 37 BT 0886 under IPC Sections 279 and 304(A) following police investigation, with the final report and relevant documents marked as exhibits. The court recorded the witness statement after the witness affirmed the accuracy of the typed testimony and appended his signature. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

A witness (Mansoor Ali), an Assistant Inspector from Karamathampatti Police Station, testified in MCOP No. 70/2023 before the Subordinate Court, Palladam on March 5, 2026, regarding FIR No. 588/2022. The witness provided evidence that a case was registered against the vehicle TN 37 BT 0886 under IPC Sections 279 and 304(A) following police investigation, with the final report and relevant documents marked as exhibits. The court recorded the witness statement after the witness affirmed the accuracy of the typed testimony and appended his signature. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

More from this court

Sub Court, Palladam All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case