SURENDHIRAN vs THE INSPECTOR, AVINASHIPALAYAM POLICE STATION — 1/2026

Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 341,392,397 IPC. Disposed: Contested--Allowed on 11th March 2026.

Case disposed

CRLMP - Criminal Miscellaneous Petition

CNR: TNTI210001902026

e-Filing Number

26-02-2026

Filing Number

2/2026

Filing Date

26-Feb-2026

Registration No

1/2026

Registration Date

26-Feb-2026

Court

Sub Court, Palladam

Judge

1-Subordinate Judge

Decision Date

11-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--Allowed

Last updated 19-Apr-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

418

Police Station

Avinashipalayam Police Station

Year

2022

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 341,392,397 IPC

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.SURENDHIRAN

    Adv. Thirukumaran Thirukumaran

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.THE INSPECTOR, AVINASHIPALAYAM POLICE STATION

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 11-Mar-2026

    Copy of JudgmentView PDF

    The Subordinate Judge at Palladam granted bail to accused Surendhiran under Section 483 of BNSS, considering he had spent 213 days in judicial custody since July 25, 2025, and the case was pending trial. The court imposed conditions including a Rs. 10,000 bond with two sureties, daily court appearances, no new offences, and no witness tampering, despite the prosecution's objection citing his four prior cases. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 11-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    Subordinate Judge

  4. 10-Mar-2026

    Enquiry

    Subordinate Judge

  5. 09-Mar-2026

    Enquiry

    Subordinate Judge

  6. 03-Mar-2026

    Enquiry

    Subordinate Judge

  7. 02-Mar-2026

    Enquiry

    Subordinate Judge

  8. 26-Feb-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  9. 26-Feb-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 1/2026

casestatus.in Summary

The Subordinate Judge at Palladam granted bail to accused Surendhiran under Section 483 of BNSS, considering he had spent 213 days in judicial custody since July 25, 2025, and the case was pending trial. The court imposed conditions including a Rs. 10,000 bond with two sureties, daily court appearances, no new offences, and no witness tampering, despite the prosecution's objection citing his four prior cases. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case