S.Thavamani vs N.Gnanasekaran — 53/2022

Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section O7R1. Status: Evidence. Next hearing: 23rd March 2026.

Evidence Next hearing 23-Mar-2026 this date has passed

OS - Original Suit

CNR: TNTI210001202022

Filing Number

121/2022

Filing Date

06-Apr-2022

Registration No

53/2022

Registration Date

08-Apr-2022

Court

Sub Court, Palladam

Judge

1-Subordinate Judge

Last updated 12-Mar-2026

Acts & Sections

Code of Civil Procedure Section O7R1

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.S.Thavamani

    Adv. Navaneetha Krishnan B

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.N.Gnanasekaran

Case History

  1. 23-Mar-2026

    Next hearingPending

  2. 05-Mar-2026

    Copy of DepositionView PDF

    This document records witness examination (PW1) in OS No. 53/2022 dated 05.03.2026, where the witness was cross-examined regarding a loan dispute. The witness's testimony revealed significant inconsistencies: he claimed to have given loans of ₹500 installments (not ₹1,000 as stated), contradicted details about the promissory note's signatories, and admitted he obtained the note from Karthikeyan without proper documentation. The court noted these discrepancies undermine the plaintiff's case for recovery against the defendant. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 05-Mar-2026

    Evidence

    Subordinate Judge

  4. 13-Feb-2026

    Evidence

    Subordinate Judge

  5. 12-Jan-2026

    Evidence

    Subordinate Judge

  6. 09-Dec-2025

    Evidence

    Subordinate Judge

  7. 25-Nov-2025

    Evidence

    Subordinate Judge

  8. 13-Nov-2025

    Evidence

    Subordinate Judge

  9. 06-Nov-2025

    Trial

    Subordinate Judge

  10. 10-Oct-2025

    Trial

    Subordinate Judge

  11. 23-Sep-2025

    Trial

    Subordinate Judge

  12. 22-Sep-2025

    Issue of Service

    Subordinate Judge

  13. 11-Sep-2025

    IA / Ea Pending / Cmp Pending / CRP Pending / Cma Pending

    Subordinate Judge

  14. 18-Jul-2025

    Ex-Parte Evidence

    Subordinate Judge

  15. 16-Jun-2025

    Ex-Parte Evidence

    Subordinate Judge

  16. 19-Mar-2025

    Ex-Parte Evidence

    Subordinate Judge

  17. 01-Feb-2025

    Ex-Parte Evidence

    Subordinate Judge

  18. 02-Dec-2024

    Ex-Parte Evidence

    Subordinate Judge

  19. 21-Oct-2024

    Ex-Parte Evidence

    Subordinate Judge

  20. 24-Sep-2024

    Ex-Parte Evidence

    Subordinate Judge

  21. 10-Sep-2024

    Ex-Parte Evidence

    Subordinate Judge

  22. 02-Aug-2024

    Ex-Parte Evidence

    Subordinate Judge

  23. 01-Jul-2024

    Ex-Parte Evidence

    Subordinate Judge

  24. 10-Jun-2024

    Ex-Parte Evidence

    Subordinate Judge

  25. 18-Mar-2024

    Ex-Parte Evidence

    Subordinate Judge

  26. 31-Jan-2024

    Ex-Parte Evidence

    Subordinate Judge

  27. 20-Dec-2023

    Ex-Parte Evidence

    Subordinate Judge

  28. 10-Nov-2023

    Ex-Parte Evidence

    Subordinate Judge

  29. 07-Oct-2023

    Ex-Parte Evidence

    Subordinate Judge

  30. 26-Aug-2023

    Ex-Parte Evidence

    Subordinate Judge

  31. 03-Aug-2023

    Ex-Parte Evidence

    Subordinate Judge

  32. 27-Jun-2023

    Ex-Parte Evidence

    Subordinate Judge

  33. 27-Apr-2023

    Ex-Parte Evidence

    Subordinate Judge

  34. 21-Apr-2023

    Ex-Parte Evidence

    Subordinate Judge

  35. 29-Mar-2023

    Ex-Parte Evidence

    Subordinate Judge

  36. 15-Mar-2023

    Ex-Parte Evidence

    Subordinate Judge

  37. 24-Feb-2023

    Written Statement

    Subordinate Judge

  38. 24-Nov-2022

    Written Statement

    Subordinate Judge

  39. 23-Sep-2022

    Issue of Service

    Subordinate Judge

  40. 03-Aug-2022

    Batta

    Subordinate Judge

  41. 15-Jun-2022

    Batta

    Subordinate Judge

  42. 08-Apr-2022

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  43. 06-Apr-2022

    Case filed

    Registration No. 53/2022

casestatus.in Summary

This document records witness examination (PW1) in OS No. 53/2022 dated 05.03.2026, where the witness was cross-examined regarding a loan dispute. The witness's testimony revealed significant inconsistencies: he claimed to have given loans of ₹500 installments (not ₹1,000 as stated), contradicted details about the promissory note's signatories, and admitted he obtained the note from Karthikeyan without proper documentation. The court noted these discrepancies undermine the plaintiff's case for recovery against the defendant. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case