Ramasamy vs Sellammal — 86/2018

Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section O 7 R 1. Status: Evidence. Next hearing: 12th March 2026.

OS - Original Suit

CNR: TNTI210001012018

Evidence

Next Hearing

12th March 2026

Filing Number

86/2018

Filing Date

17-02-2016

Registration No

86/2018

Registration Date

23-02-2016

Court

Sub Court, Palladam

Judge

1-Subordinate Judge

Acts & Sections

Code of Civil Procedure Section O 7 R 1

Petitioner(s)

Ramasamy

Adv. Rangasami Krishnaveni

Respondent(s)

Sellammal

Balasubramaniam

Vijayalakshmi

Sivakami

Subbathal

Lakshmi

Rajamani

Nachimuthu

Rajendran

Amaravathi

Sivakumar

Nirmala

Minor.Dharaneesh

Adv. Ms.S.Dharani

Minor.Kausikha

Kuppusamy

Velumani

Ravichandran

Ramasamy

Vijayalakshmi

Muthusamy

Nataraj

Adv. Sarvabhauman J

Valliammal alias Pappathi

Hearing History

Judge: 1-Subordinate Judge

09-03-2026

Evidence

05-03-2026

IA / EA Pending / CMP Pending / CRP Pending / CMA Pending

02-03-2026

IA / EA Pending / CMP Pending / CRP Pending / CMA Pending

27-02-2026

IA / EA Pending / CMP Pending / CRP Pending / CMA Pending

24-02-2026

IA / EA Pending / CMP Pending / CRP Pending / CMA Pending

Interim Orders

02-02-2026
Copy of Judgment

Summary: The petition filed by Defendants 15 and 17 to set aside an ex-parte order was allowed. The court found that since the suit involves a partition relief requiring participation of all parties for complete justice, the defendants' belated application (filed 6 years after the ex-parte order) warranted reconsideration. However, the petition was allowed subject to payment of costs of Rs. 4,000 to the plaintiff by February 13, 2026, with a cost memo hearing scheduled for February 16, 2026. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Summary: The petition filed by Defendants 15 and 17 to set aside an ex-parte order was allowed. The court found that since the suit involves a partition relief requiring participation of all parties for complete justice, the defendants' belated application (filed 6 years after the ex-parte order) warranted reconsideration. However, the petition was allowed subject to payment of costs of Rs. 4,000 to the plaintiff by February 13, 2026, with a cost memo hearing scheduled for February 16, 2026. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

More from this court

Sub Court, Palladam All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case