Periyasamy vs Ganaesan — 46/2023

Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section 22(a). Status: IA / EA Pending / CMP Pending / CRP Pending / CMA Pending. Next hearing: 24th March 2026.

OS - Original Suit

CNR: TNTI210000922023

IA / EA Pending / CMP Pending / CRP Pending / CMA Pending

Next Hearing

24th March 2026

Filing Number

97/2023

Filing Date

27-01-2023

Registration No

46/2023

Registration Date

08-02-2023

Court

Sub Court, Palladam

Judge

1-Subordinate Judge

Acts & Sections

Code of Civil Procedure Section 22(a)

Petitioner(s)

Periyasamy

Adv. A. Arumugam

Respondent(s)

Ganaesan

Renugadevi

Hearing History

Judge: 1-Subordinate Judge

05-03-2026

IA / EA Pending / CMP Pending / CRP Pending / CMA Pending

26-02-2026

Evidence

12-02-2026

Evidence

07-02-2026

Evidence

03-02-2026

Evidence

Interim Orders

07-02-2026
Copy of Deposition

This is a witness examination transcript (PW1 testimony) in a property dispute case (OS No. 46/2023) dated 07.02.2026, not a final court order with a disposition. The document records the cross-examination of witness Periyasamy regarding a property sale agreement dated 13.12.2019, where he testified about the purchase terms, stamp duty, and alleged fraudulent conduct by the defendants. No final judgment, bail decision, or case outcome is announced in this document—it merely documents the witness's sworn testimony and his responses to questioning. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

This is a witness examination transcript (PW1 testimony) in a property dispute case (OS No. 46/2023) dated 07.02.2026, not a final court order with a disposition. The document records the cross-examination of witness Periyasamy regarding a property sale agreement dated 13.12.2019, where he testified about the purchase terms, stamp duty, and alleged fraudulent conduct by the defendants. No final judgment, bail decision, or case outcome is announced in this document—it merely documents the witness's sworn testimony and his responses to questioning. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

More from this court

Sub Court, Palladam All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case