Periyasamy vs Ganaesan — 46/2023

Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section 22(a). Status: IA / Ea Pending / Cmp Pending / CRP Pending / Cma Pending. Next hearing: 24th March 2026.

IA / Ea Pending / Cmp Pending / CRP Pending / Cma Pending Next hearing 24-Mar-2026 this date has passed

OS - Original Suit

CNR: TNTI210000922023

Filing Number

97/2023

Filing Date

27-Jan-2023

Registration No

46/2023

Registration Date

08-Feb-2023

Court

Sub Court, Palladam

Judge

1-Subordinate Judge

Last updated 12-Mar-2026

Acts & Sections

Code of Civil Procedure Section 22(a)

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Periyasamy

    Adv. A. Arumugam

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Ganaesan

  2. 2.Renugadevi

Case History

  1. 24-Mar-2026

    Next hearingPending

  2. 05-Mar-2026

    IA / Ea Pending / Cmp Pending / CRP Pending / Cma Pending

    Subordinate Judge

  3. 26-Feb-2026

    Evidence

    Subordinate Judge

  4. 12-Feb-2026

    Evidence

    Subordinate Judge

  5. 07-Feb-2026

    Copy of DepositionView PDF

    This is a witness examination transcript (PW1 testimony) in a property dispute case (OS No. 46/2023) dated 07.02.2026, not a final court order with a disposition. The document records the cross-examination of witness Periyasamy regarding a property sale agreement dated 13.12.2019, where he testified about the purchase terms, stamp duty, and alleged fraudulent conduct by the defendants. No final judgment, bail decision, or case outcome is announced in this document—it merely documents the witness's sworn testimony and his responses to questioning. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  6. 07-Feb-2026

    Evidence

    Subordinate Judge

  7. 03-Feb-2026

    Evidence

    Subordinate Judge

  8. 21-Jan-2026

    Evidence

    Subordinate Judge

  9. 05-Dec-2025

    Evidence

    Subordinate Judge

  10. 18-Nov-2025

    Evidence

    Subordinate Judge

  11. 28-Oct-2025

    Evidence

    Subordinate Judge

  12. 13-Oct-2025

    Evidence

    Subordinate Judge

  13. 19-Sep-2025

    Copy of DepositionView PDF

  14. 19-Sep-2025

    Evidence

    Subordinate Judge

  15. 12-Sep-2025

    Trial

    Subordinate Judge

  16. 02-Sep-2025

    Trial

    Subordinate Judge

  17. 29-Jul-2025

    Trial

    Subordinate Judge

  18. 13-Jun-2025

    Trial

    Subordinate Judge

  19. 09-Apr-2025

    Trial

    Subordinate Judge

  20. 06-Mar-2025

    Trial

    Subordinate Judge

  21. 24-Feb-2025

    Trial

    Subordinate Judge

  22. 30-Jan-2025

    Trial

    Subordinate Judge

  23. 02-Jan-2025

    Trial

    Subordinate Judge

  24. 11-Nov-2024

    Trial

    Subordinate Judge

  25. 18-Sep-2024

    Trial

    Subordinate Judge

  26. 06-Aug-2024

    Trial

    Subordinate Judge

  27. 11-Jul-2024

    Trial

    Subordinate Judge

  28. 03-Apr-2024

    Trial

    Subordinate Judge

  29. 05-Feb-2024

    Trial

    Subordinate Judge

  30. 14-Dec-2023

    Trial

    Subordinate Judge

  31. 07-Nov-2023

    Trial

    Subordinate Judge

  32. 21-Sep-2023

    Trial

    Subordinate Judge

  33. 26-Aug-2023

    Trial

    Subordinate Judge

  34. 03-Aug-2023

    Trial

    Subordinate Judge

  35. 13-May-2023

    Trial

    Subordinate Judge

  36. 28-Apr-2023

    Lok Adalat

    Subordinate Judge

  37. 15-Mar-2023

    Trial

    Subordinate Judge

  38. 13-Mar-2023

    Issues

    Subordinate Judge

  39. 10-Mar-2023

    Issue of Service

    Subordinate Judge

  40. 08-Feb-2023

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  41. 27-Jan-2023

    Case filed

    Registration No. 46/2023

casestatus.in Summary

This is a witness examination transcript (PW1 testimony) in a property dispute case (OS No. 46/2023) dated 07.02.2026, not a final court order with a disposition. The document records the cross-examination of witness Periyasamy regarding a property sale agreement dated 13.12.2019, where he testified about the purchase terms, stamp duty, and alleged fraudulent conduct by the defendants. No final judgment, bail decision, or case outcome is announced in this document—it merely documents the witness's sworn testimony and his responses to questioning. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case