Rathinambal vs Ammaniammal (Died) — 1/2025
Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section 37(2). Disposed: Contested--Decreed without cost on 24th March 2026.
OS - Original Suit
CNR: TNTI210000092025
Filing Number
10/2025
Filing Date
16-Sep-2017
Registration No
1/2025
Registration Date
16-Sep-2017
Court
Sub Court, Palladam
Judge
1-Subordinate Judge
Decision Date
24-Mar-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--Decreed without cost
Last updated 19-Apr-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.Rathinambal
Adv. Rangasami Krishnaveni
Respondent(s)
-
1.Ammaniammal (Died)
-
2.Malathi
-
3.Chandramurali
-
4.Yogeshwaran
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
24-Mar-2026
Copy of JudgmentView PDF
The court partially decreed the suit, granting the plaintiff partition rights only for Item No.2 of the property (dividing it equally between plaintiff and defendants), while dismissing her claim for Item No.1 as a joint family property. The court found that the plaintiff failed to provide sufficient documentary evidence proving Item No.1 was purchased from ancestral joint family funds, placing the burden on her to establish this fact before defendants' contrary claims could be scrutinized. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
24-Mar-2026
Disposed
Subordinate Judge
-
18-Mar-2026
Judgement
Subordinate Judge
-
10-Mar-2026
Judgement
Subordinate Judge
-
09-Mar-2026
Arguments
Subordinate Judge
-
06-Mar-2026
Arguments
Subordinate Judge
-
02-Mar-2026
Copy of DepositionView PDF
-
02-Mar-2026
Evidence
Subordinate Judge
-
25-Feb-2026
Evidence
Subordinate Judge
-
19-Feb-2026
Evidence
Subordinate Judge
-
06-Feb-2026
Evidence
Subordinate Judge
-
03-Feb-2026
Copy of DepositionView PDF
-
03-Feb-2026
Evidence
Subordinate Judge
-
23-Jan-2026
Evidence
Subordinate Judge
-
20-Jan-2026
Copy of DepositionView PDF
-
20-Jan-2026
Copy of DepositionView PDF
-
20-Jan-2026
Copy of DepositionView PDF
-
20-Jan-2026
Evidence
Subordinate Judge
-
05-Jan-2026
Evidence
Subordinate Judge
-
09-Dec-2025
Evidence
Subordinate Judge
-
04-Dec-2025
Evidence
Subordinate Judge
-
25-Nov-2025
Evidence
Subordinate Judge
-
21-Nov-2025
Evidence
Subordinate Judge
-
17-Nov-2025
Evidence
Subordinate Judge
-
11-Nov-2025
Evidence
Subordinate Judge
-
04-Nov-2025
Copy of DepositionView PDF
-
04-Nov-2025
Copy of DepositionView PDF
-
04-Nov-2025
Evidence
Subordinate Judge
-
31-Oct-2025
Evidence
Subordinate Judge
-
25-Oct-2025
Evidence
Subordinate Judge
-
17-Oct-2025
Additional Written Statement
Subordinate Judge
-
06-Oct-2025
Additional Written Statement
Subordinate Judge
-
24-Sep-2025
Written Statement
Subordinate Judge
-
22-Sep-2025
Written Statement
Subordinate Judge
-
17-Sep-2025
Written Statement
Subordinate Judge
-
09-Sep-2025
Written Statement
Subordinate Judge
-
19-Aug-2025
Written Statement
Subordinate Judge
-
05-Aug-2025
Written Statement
Subordinate Judge
-
01-Aug-2025
For further Proceedings
Subordinate Judge
-
31-Jul-2025
Amendment
Subordinate Judge
-
30-Jul-2025
Amendment
Subordinate Judge
-
09-Jul-2025
IA / Ea Pending / Cmp Pending / CRP Pending / Cma Pending
Subordinate Judge
-
24-Jun-2025
Copy of JudgmentView PDF
-
24-Jun-2025
IA / Ea Pending / Cmp Pending / CRP Pending / Cma Pending
Subordinate Judge
-
23-Jun-2025
IA / Ea Pending / Cmp Pending / CRP Pending / Cma Pending
Subordinate Judge
-
12-Jun-2025
IA / Ea Pending / Cmp Pending / CRP Pending / Cma Pending
Subordinate Judge
-
03-Jun-2025
IA / Ea Pending / Cmp Pending / CRP Pending / Cma Pending
Subordinate Judge
-
02-Jun-2025
IA / Ea Pending / Cmp Pending / CRP Pending / Cma Pending
Subordinate Judge
-
28-Apr-2025
IA / Ea Pending / Cmp Pending / CRP Pending / Cma Pending
Subordinate Judge
-
21-Apr-2025
Evidence
Subordinate Judge
-
07-Apr-2025
Evidence
Subordinate Judge
-
04-Apr-2025
Trial
Subordinate Judge
-
24-Mar-2025
Trial
Subordinate Judge
-
14-Mar-2025
Trial
Subordinate Judge
-
05-Feb-2025
Await Records
Subordinate Judge
-
04-Jan-2025
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
16-Sep-2017
Case filed
Registration No. 1/2025
The court partially decreed the suit, granting the plaintiff partition rights only for Item No.2 of the property (dividing it equally between plaintiff and defendants), while dismissing her claim for Item No.1 as a joint family property. The court found that the plaintiff failed to provide sufficient documentary evidence proving Item No.1 was purchased from ancestral joint family funds, placing the burden on her to establish this fact before defendants' contrary claims could be scrutinized. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts