Park Trust vs Manokaran Advocate - Giri N V — 45/2021

Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section 25(d),27(c). Status: Arguments. Next hearing: 01st April 2026.

OS - Original Suit

CNR: TNTI180029742020

Arguments

Next Hearing

01st April 2026

Filing Number

5724/2020

Filing Date

23-12-2020

Registration No

45/2021

Registration Date

19-01-2021

Court

Principal District Court, Tiruppur

Judge

1-Principal District Judge

Acts & Sections

Code of Civil Procedure Section 25(d),27(c)
Ia/13/2024 Classification : Petition to Summon Witness Section ManokaranPark Trust
Ia/16/2024 Classification : Recall Petition Section Park TrustManokaran
Ia/17/2024 Classification : Recall Petition Section Park TrustManokaran
Ia/18/2024 Classification : Reopen Petition Section Park TrustManokaran
Ia/19/2026 Classification : Adjournment Petition Section Park TrustManokaran
Ia/20/2026 Classification : Adjournment Petition Section Park TrustManokaran

Petitioner(s)

Park Trust

Adv. S. Bharath

Respondent(s)

Manokaran Advocate - Giri N V

Hearing History

Judge: 1-Principal District Judge

05-03-2026

Arguments

10-02-2026

Arguments

29-01-2026

Arguments

06-01-2026

Arguments

16-12-2025

Arguments

Interim Orders

19-07-2024
Copy of Judgment

Summary: The Principal District Court, Tiruppur dismissed the petition (I.A. No. 18/2024) filed under Section 151 of the Code of Civil Procedure on 19.07.2024. The petitioners sought to reopen the suit to recall PW4 for further examination regarding the property valuation appraisal report and to record oral evidence from the Advocate Commissioner. No order as to costs was made. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Summary: The Principal District Court, Tiruppur dismissed the petition (I.A. No. 18/2024) filed under Section 151 of the Code of Civil Procedure on 19.07.2024. The petitioners sought to reopen the suit to recall PW4 for further examination regarding the property valuation appraisal report and to record oral evidence from the Advocate Commissioner. No order as to costs was made. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

More from this court

Principal District Court, Tiruppur All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case