Yousuf vs State rep by inspector of police,Avinasipalayam — 517/2026

Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 483. Disposed: Contested--Allowed on 12th March 2026.

Case disposed

CRLMP - Criminal Miscellaneous Petition

CNR: TNTI180011472026

e-Filing Number

05-03-2026

Filing Number

773/2026

Filing Date

06-Mar-2026

Registration No

517/2026

Registration Date

06-Mar-2026

Court

Principal District Court, Tiruppur

Judge

1-Principal District Judge

Decision Date

12-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--Allowed

Last updated 19-Apr-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

203

Police Station

Avinashipalayam Police Station

Year

2024

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 483

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Yousuf

    Adv. Tamilarsan Moorthy

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.State rep by inspector of police,Avinasipalayam

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 12-Mar-2026

    Copy of JudgmentView PDF

    The Principal Sessions Judge of Tiruppur granted bail to Yousuf, accused of burglary and theft (IPC sections 457, 380), despite three previous pending cases against him, considering his 84 days of incarceration and relying on Supreme Court precedent. The court imposed strict conditions including a Rs. 10,000 bond with two sureties, mandatory court appearances, prohibition against witness tampering or absconding, with potential fresh charges under section 269 BNS if he breaches conditions. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 12-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    Principal District Judge

  4. 09-Mar-2026

    Enquiry

    Principal District Judge

  5. 06-Mar-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  6. 06-Mar-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 517/2026

casestatus.in Summary

The Principal Sessions Judge of Tiruppur granted bail to Yousuf, accused of burglary and theft (IPC sections 457, 380), despite three previous pending cases against him, considering his 84 days of incarceration and relying on Supreme Court precedent. The court imposed strict conditions including a Rs. 10,000 bond with two sureties, mandatory court appearances, prohibition against witness tampering or absconding, with potential fresh charges under section 269 BNS if he breaches conditions. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case