Thulasitharan vs State Rep by Inspector of Police Komaralingam Police station — 518/2026

Case under Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 304(2). Disposed: Contested--Dismissed on 11th March 2026.

Case disposedSub Stage

CRLMP - Criminal Miscellaneous Petition

CNR: TNTI180011342026

e-Filing Number

05-03-2026

Filing Number

761/2026

Filing Date

05-Mar-2026

Registration No

518/2026

Registration Date

06-Mar-2026

Court

Principal District Court, Tiruppur

Judge

1-Principal District Judge

Decision Date

11-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--Dismissed

Last updated 19-Apr-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

26

Police Station

Komaralingam Police Station

Year

2026

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 304(2)

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Thulasitharan

    Adv. SHANKAR VAITHIYANATHAN

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.State Rep by Inspector of Police Komaralingam Police station

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 11-Mar-2026

    Copy of JudgmentView PDF

    Summary: The Principal Sessions Judge, Tiruppur dismissed Thulasitharan's bail petition under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagrik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 in a case involving alleged snatching of a gold Mangalsutra from a 65-year-old woman. The court, considering the nature and gravity of the offense under Section 304(2) BNS, the ongoing investigation stage, and the circumstances of the incident, found no grounds to enlarge the petitioner on bail despite his 35-day incarceration. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 11-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    Principal District Judge

  4. 09-Mar-2026

    Issue of Service

    Principal District Judge

  5. 06-Mar-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  6. 05-Mar-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 518/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Summary: The Principal Sessions Judge, Tiruppur dismissed Thulasitharan's bail petition under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagrik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 in a case involving alleged snatching of a gold Mangalsutra from a 65-year-old woman. The court, considering the nature and gravity of the offense under Section 304(2) BNS, the ongoing investigation stage, and the circumstances of the incident, found no grounds to enlarge the petitioner on bail despite his 35-day incarceration. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case