CHINRASU vs State of Tamil Nadu Rep by Tiruppur AVINASHIPALAYAM PS — 503/2026

Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 483. Disposed: Contested--Allowed on 07th March 2026.

Case disposedSub Stage

CRLMP - Criminal Miscellaneous Petition

CNR: TNTI180011172026

e-Filing Number

04-03-2026

Filing Number

756/2026

Filing Date

05-Mar-2026

Registration No

503/2026

Registration Date

05-Mar-2026

Court

Principal District Court, Tiruppur

Judge

1-Principal District Judge

Decision Date

07-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--Allowed

Last updated 12-Mar-2026

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 483
Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 304(2)

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.CHINRASU

    Adv. P. MURUGESAN

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.State of Tamil Nadu Rep by Tiruppur AVINASHIPALAYAM PS (Police Station)

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 07-Mar-2026

    Copy of JudgmentView PDF

    The Principal Sessions Judge, Tiruppur granted bail to accused Chinrasu (age 29) in a gold chain snatching case under Section 304(2) BNS, considering his 14-day incarceration, completed investigation, and lack of prior criminal history. The court ordered his release on a Rs. 10,000 bond with two sureties, requiring daily court appearances for 30 days and imposing conditions against evidence tampering, absconding, and witness interference. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 07-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    Principal District Judge

  4. 05-Mar-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  5. 05-Mar-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 503/2026

casestatus.in Summary

The Principal Sessions Judge, Tiruppur granted bail to accused Chinrasu (age 29) in a gold chain snatching case under Section 304(2) BNS, considering his 14-day incarceration, completed investigation, and lack of prior criminal history. The court ordered his release on a Rs. 10,000 bond with two sureties, requiring daily court appearances for 30 days and imposing conditions against evidence tampering, absconding, and witness interference. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case