Vijay vs State of Tamil Nadu Rep by Tiruppur 15 VELAMPALYAM PS — 504/2026

Case under Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 296(b),115(2),109,351(3). Disposed: Contested--Dismissed on 10th March 2026.

Case disposed

CRLMP - Criminal Miscellaneous Petition

CNR: TNTI180011162026

e-Filing Number

04-03-2026

Filing Number

755/2026

Filing Date

05-Mar-2026

Registration No

504/2026

Registration Date

05-Mar-2026

Court

Principal District Court, Tiruppur

Judge

1-Principal District Judge

Decision Date

10-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--Dismissed

Last updated 12-Mar-2026

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 296(b),115(2),109,351(3)
Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 483

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Vijay

    Adv. Parameshwaran R

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.State of Tamil Nadu Rep by Tiruppur 15 VELAMPALYAM PS (Police Station)

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 10-Mar-2026

    Copy of JudgmentView PDF

    Summary: The Principal Sessions Judge, Tiruppur dismissed Vijay's bail petition under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023. The petitioner was arrested on 27.02.2026 for alleged attempted murder and causing injury by hitting the complainant with a car, and had spent 11 days in judicial custody. The court denied bail considering the gravity of charges, the petitioner's criminal history (six prior cases), ongoing investigation, and public interest. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 10-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    Principal District Judge

  4. 07-Mar-2026

    Issue of Service

    Principal District Judge

  5. 05-Mar-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  6. 05-Mar-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 504/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Summary: The Principal Sessions Judge, Tiruppur dismissed Vijay's bail petition under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023. The petitioner was arrested on 27.02.2026 for alleged attempted murder and causing injury by hitting the complainant with a car, and had spent 11 days in judicial custody. The court denied bail considering the gravity of charges, the petitioner's criminal history (six prior cases), ongoing investigation, and public interest. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case