Chandra vs State of Tamil Nadu Rep by Tiruppur KANIYUR PS — 509/2026

Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 482. Disposed: Contested--Allowed on 07th March 2026.

Case disposedSub Stage

CRLMP - Criminal Miscellaneous Petition

CNR: TNTI180011072026

e-Filing Number

03-03-2026

Filing Number

748/2026

Filing Date

04-Mar-2026

Registration No

509/2026

Registration Date

05-Mar-2026

Court

Principal District Court, Tiruppur

Judge

1-Principal District Judge

Decision Date

07-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--Allowed

Last updated 12-Mar-2026

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 482
Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 191(3),296(b),133,118(1),351(3)

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Chandra

    Adv. SATHISHKUMAR V

  2. 2.Abinaya

    Adv. SATHISHKUMAR V

  3. 3.Kathirvel

    Adv. SATHISHKUMAR V

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.State of Tamil Nadu Rep by Tiruppur KANIYUR PS (Police Station)

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 07-Mar-2026

    Copy of JudgmentView PDF

    The Principal Sessions Judge, Tiruppur granted anticipatory bail to three petitioners (Chandra, Abinaya, and Kathirvel) in a case involving charges of making false statements, criminal intimidation, and abuse arising from a property ownership dispute related to temple construction. The court found the injuries sustained were simple in nature, investigation was substantially complete, and no prior criminal history existed, warranting bail with conditions including Rs.10,000 bonds, daily police reporting, and surrender within 15 days. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 07-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    Principal District Judge

  4. 05-Mar-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  5. 04-Mar-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 509/2026

casestatus.in Summary

The Principal Sessions Judge, Tiruppur granted anticipatory bail to three petitioners (Chandra, Abinaya, and Kathirvel) in a case involving charges of making false statements, criminal intimidation, and abuse arising from a property ownership dispute related to temple construction. The court found the injuries sustained were simple in nature, investigation was substantially complete, and no prior criminal history existed, warranting bail with conditions including Rs.10,000 bonds, daily police reporting, and surrender within 15 days. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case