Vasanthakumar vs State of Tamil Nadu Rep by Tiruppur KOMARALINGAM PS — 507/2026

Case under Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 296(b),118(1),351(3). Disposed: Contested--Allowed on 07th March 2026.

Case disposedSub Stage

CRLMP - Criminal Miscellaneous Petition

CNR: TNTI180011012026

e-Filing Number

04-03-2026

Filing Number

742/2026

Filing Date

04-Mar-2026

Registration No

507/2026

Registration Date

05-Mar-2026

Court

Principal District Court, Tiruppur

Judge

1-Principal District Judge

Decision Date

07-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--Allowed

Last updated 12-Mar-2026

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 296(b),118(1),351(3)
Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 483(1)

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Vasanthakumar

    Adv. Muthulakshimi T

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.State of Tamil Nadu Rep by Tiruppur KOMARALINGAM PS (Police Station)

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 07-Mar-2026

    Copy of JudgmentView PDF

    The Principal Sessions Judge, Tiruppur granted the petitioner's petition under Section 483(1)(b) BNSS Act 2023, fully relaxing the daily police station reporting condition imposed in the earlier bail order. The court found that the accused had complied with the condition for 30 days with only one default, investigation was complete, and given the case stage, relaxation was warranted, while dismissing the prosecution's concerns about absconding or witness tampering. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 07-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    Principal District Judge

  4. 05-Mar-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  5. 04-Mar-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 507/2026

casestatus.in Summary

The Principal Sessions Judge, Tiruppur granted the petitioner's petition under Section 483(1)(b) BNSS Act 2023, fully relaxing the daily police station reporting condition imposed in the earlier bail order. The court found that the accused had complied with the condition for 30 days with only one default, investigation was complete, and given the case stage, relaxation was warranted, while dismissing the prosecution's concerns about absconding or witness tampering. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case