MANIKUMAR vs State of Tamil Nadu Rep by Tiruppur KANGEYAM PS — 516/2026

Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 483(1)(b). Disposed: Contested--Allowed on 09th March 2026.

Case disposed

CRLMP - Criminal Miscellaneous Petition

CNR: TNTI180010872026

e-Filing Number

03-03-2026

Filing Number

733/2026

Filing Date

03-Mar-2026

Registration No

516/2026

Registration Date

06-Mar-2026

Court

Principal District Court, Tiruppur

Judge

1-Principal District Judge

Decision Date

09-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--Allowed

Last updated 19-Apr-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

552

Police Station

Kangayam Police Station

Year

2025

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 483(1)(b)

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.MANIKUMAR

    Adv. sathya k

  2. 2.THAMSHINI

    Adv. sathya k

  3. 3.SAROJA

    Adv. sathya k

  4. 4.PRIYA

    Adv. sathya k

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.State of Tamil Nadu Rep by Tiruppur KANGEYAM PS (Police Station)

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 09-Mar-2026

    Copy of JudgmentView PDF

    The Principal Sessions Judge, Tiruppur, allowed the petition and totally relaxed the bail conditions imposed on four accused persons (Manikkumar, Thamshini, Saroja, and Priya) in Criminal Case No. 552/2025. The court found that the accused had complied promptly with the previous condition of appearing before police once weekly for 17 times, and since the investigation was completed with the final report filed, complete relaxation of reporting conditions was warranted. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 09-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    Principal District Judge

  4. 06-Mar-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  5. 03-Mar-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 516/2026

casestatus.in Summary

The Principal Sessions Judge, Tiruppur, allowed the petition and totally relaxed the bail conditions imposed on four accused persons (Manikkumar, Thamshini, Saroja, and Priya) in Criminal Case No. 552/2025. The court found that the accused had complied promptly with the previous condition of appearing before police once weekly for 17 times, and since the investigation was completed with the final report filed, complete relaxation of reporting conditions was warranted. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case