I Selvamani vs State of Tamil Nadu Rep by Tiruppur RURAL PS — 510/2026
Case under Bharatiya Sakshya Adhiniyam Section 316(2),336(2),and340(2). Disposed: Contested--Dismissed on 11th March 2026.
CRLMP - Criminal Miscellaneous Petition
CNR: TNTI180010832026
e-Filing Number
03-03-2026
Filing Number
730/2026
Filing Date
03-03-2026
Registration No
510/2026
Registration Date
05-03-2026
Court
Principal District Court, Tiruppur
Judge
1-Principal District Judge
Decision Date
11th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--Dismissed
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
I Selvamani
Adv. Sundareswaran M
Respondent(s)
State of Tamil Nadu Rep by Tiruppur RURAL PS (Police Station)
Hearing History
Judge: 1-Principal District Judge
Disposed
Enquiry
Issue of Service
Issue of Service
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 11-03-2026 | Disposed |
| 09-03-2026 | Enquiry |
| 07-03-2026 | Issue of Service |
| 05-03-2026 | Issue of Service |
Final Orders / Judgements
Case Summary The Principal Sessions Judge, Tiruppur dismissed Selvamani's bail petition under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, in a case involving charges under Sections 316(2), 336(2), and 340(2) of BNS. The petitioner was accused of hiring a car, manipulating its registration number, and handing it to a co-accused; the court found the nature and gravity of the offense, ongoing investigation stage, and lack of changed circumstances (the co-accused's anticipatory bail was similarly dismissed) warranted continued detention. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary The Principal Sessions Judge, Tiruppur dismissed Selvamani's bail petition under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, in a case involving charges under Sections 316(2), 336(2), and 340(2) of BNS. The petitioner was accused of hiring a car, manipulating its registration number, and handing it to a co-accused; the court found the nature and gravity of the offense, ongoing investigation stage, and lack of changed circumstances (the co-accused's anticipatory bail was similarly dismissed) warranted continued detention. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Explore other courts