Noushad vs State of Tamil Nadu Rep by Tiruppur NORTH PS — 491/2026

Case under Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 123. Disposed: Contested--Dismissed on 09th March 2026.

Case disposed

CRLMP - Criminal Miscellaneous Petition

CNR: TNTI180010812026

e-Filing Number

03-03-2026

Filing Number

728/2026

Filing Date

03-Mar-2026

Registration No

491/2026

Registration Date

03-Mar-2026

Court

Principal District Court, Tiruppur

Judge

1-Principal District Judge

Decision Date

09-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--Dismissed

Last updated 12-Mar-2026

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 123
Cigarette and Other Tobacco Products Acts 2003 Section 22(a)
Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 483

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Noushad

    Adv. Palaniselvam M

  2. 2.Shijo

    Adv. Palaniselvam M

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.State of Tamil Nadu Rep by Tiruppur NORTH PS (Police Station)

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 09-Mar-2026

    Copy of JudgmentView PDF

    The Principal Sessions Judge, Tiruppur dismissed the bail petition of Noushad and Shijo, who were arrested for illegal possession of 40 kg of banned tobacco products for sale under BNS Section 123 and the Cigarette and other Tobacco Products Act, 2003. The court, considering the gravity of the offense, ongoing investigation, the large quantity of contraband involved, and the High Court's dismissal of anticipatory bail for a co-accused, found no grounds to grant bail. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 09-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    Principal District Judge

  4. 05-Mar-2026

    Enquiry

    Principal District Judge

  5. 03-Mar-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  6. 03-Mar-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 491/2026

casestatus.in Summary

The Principal Sessions Judge, Tiruppur dismissed the bail petition of Noushad and Shijo, who were arrested for illegal possession of 40 kg of banned tobacco products for sale under BNS Section 123 and the Cigarette and other Tobacco Products Act, 2003. The court, considering the gravity of the offense, ongoing investigation, the large quantity of contraband involved, and the High Court's dismissal of anticipatory bail for a co-accused, found no grounds to grant bail. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case