Khaja shariff vs State of Tamil Nadu Rep by Tiruppur PERUMANALLUR PS — 492/2026

Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 483(1)(b). Disposed: Contested--Allowed on 05th March 2026.

Case disposedSub Stage

CRLMP - Criminal Miscellaneous Petition

CNR: TNTI180010562026

e-Filing Number

28-02-2026

Filing Number

712/2026

Filing Date

02-Mar-2026

Registration No

492/2026

Registration Date

03-Mar-2026

Court

Principal District Court, Tiruppur

Judge

1-Principal District Judge

Decision Date

05-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--Allowed

Last updated 12-Mar-2026

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 483(1)(b)

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Khaja shariff

    Adv. Kannan

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.State of Tamil Nadu Rep by Tiruppur PERUMANALLUR PS (Police Station)

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 05-Mar-2026

    Copy of JudgmentView PDF

    The Principal Sessions Judge, Tiruppur allowed the petition of Khaja Shariff to totally relax the bail condition requiring daily police station reporting at 10:00 a.m. The court found that the accused had complied with the condition promptly for 43 days without deviation, the investigation was completed with the final report filed, and considering the case stage, relaxation was warranted despite the Public Prosecutor's objections regarding absconding and witness tampering risks. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 05-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    Principal District Judge

  4. 03-Mar-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  5. 02-Mar-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 492/2026

casestatus.in Summary

The Principal Sessions Judge, Tiruppur allowed the petition of Khaja Shariff to totally relax the bail condition requiring daily police station reporting at 10:00 a.m. The court found that the accused had complied with the condition promptly for 43 days without deviation, the investigation was completed with the final report filed, and considering the case stage, relaxation was warranted despite the Public Prosecutor's objections regarding absconding and witness tampering risks. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case