Bijith vs State of Tamil Nadu Rep by Tiruppur NORTH PS — 484/2026

Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 483. Disposed: Contested--Allowed on 06th March 2026.

Case disposed

CRLMP - Criminal Miscellaneous Petition

CNR: TNTI180010532026

e-Filing Number

01-03-2026

Filing Number

709/2026

Filing Date

02-Mar-2026

Registration No

484/2026

Registration Date

02-Mar-2026

Court

Principal District Court, Tiruppur

Judge

1-Principal District Judge

Decision Date

06-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--Allowed

Last updated 12-Mar-2026

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 483
Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 123

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Bijith

    Adv. Mohanraj M

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.State of Tamil Nadu Rep by Tiruppur NORTH PS (Police Station)

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 06-Mar-2026

    Copy of JudgmentView PDF

    The Principal Sessions Court, Tiruppur granted bail to Bijith K.E., accused of possessing 9 kg of banned tobacco products for sale under BNS Section 123 and COTPA Act Section 22(a). The court considered the petitioner's 8-day incarceration, lack of prior criminal history, and his wife's hospitalization, granting bail on execution of a Rs. 10,000 bond with two sureties, a non-refundable Rs. 5,000 deposit to Legal Services Authority, and conditions including daily police reporting and no evidence tampering. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 06-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    Principal District Judge

  4. 05-Mar-2026

    Enquiry

    Principal District Judge

  5. 04-Mar-2026

    Enquiry

    Principal District Judge

  6. 02-Mar-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  7. 02-Mar-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 484/2026

casestatus.in Summary

The Principal Sessions Court, Tiruppur granted bail to Bijith K.E., accused of possessing 9 kg of banned tobacco products for sale under BNS Section 123 and COTPA Act Section 22(a). The court considered the petitioner's 8-day incarceration, lack of prior criminal history, and his wife's hospitalization, granting bail on execution of a Rs. 10,000 bond with two sureties, a non-refundable Rs. 5,000 deposit to Legal Services Authority, and conditions including daily police reporting and no evidence tampering. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case