Ajit Kisan vs State of Tamil Nadu Rep by Tiruppur UDUMALPET PS — 478/2026
Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 483. Disposed: Contested--Dismissed on 05th March 2026.
CRLMP - Criminal Miscellaneous Petition
CNR: TNTI180010452026
e-Filing Number
02-03-2026
Filing Number
701/2026
Filing Date
02-03-2026
Registration No
478/2026
Registration Date
02-03-2026
Court
Principal District Court, Tiruppur
Judge
1-Principal District Judge
Decision Date
05th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--Dismissed
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Ajit Kisan
Adv. Naveen Kumar
Akash munda
Adv. Naveen Kumar
Amrit lugun
Adv. Naveen Kumar
Narottam Kisan
Adv. Naveen Kumar
Sujit Munda
Adv. Naveen Kumar
Bindu munda
Adv. Naveen Kumar
Binod kisan
Adv. Naveen Kumar
Respondent(s)
State of Tamil Nadu Rep by Tiruppur UDUMALPET PS (Police Station)
Hearing History
Judge: 1-Principal District Judge
Disposed
Enquiry
Issue of Service
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 05-03-2026 | Disposed |
| 04-03-2026 | Enquiry |
| 02-03-2026 | Issue of Service |
Final Orders / Judgements
The Principal Sessions Court, Tiruppur dismissed the bail petition filed by seven accused persons (Ajit Kisan, Akashmunda, Amrit Lugun, Narottam Kisan, Sujith Munda, Bindu Munda, and Binod Kisan) charged with murder and causing injury under various sections of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023. The court found that considering the nature and gravity of the offence, the stage of investigation, and the manner of the alleged crime, the petitioners were not entitled to bail and should remain in judicial custody. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
The Principal Sessions Court, Tiruppur dismissed the bail petition filed by seven accused persons (Ajit Kisan, Akashmunda, Amrit Lugun, Narottam Kisan, Sujith Munda, Bindu Munda, and Binod Kisan) charged with murder and causing injury under various sections of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023. The court found that considering the nature and gravity of the offence, the stage of investigation, and the manner of the alleged crime, the petitioners were not entitled to bail and should remain in judicial custody. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Explore other courts