Saran vs State of Tamil Nadu Rep by Tiruppur CENTRAL PS — 470/2026

Case under Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 123r/w110. Disposed: Contested--Allowed on 05th March 2026.

Case disposed

CRLMP - Criminal Miscellaneous Petition

CNR: TNTI180010332026

e-Filing Number

27-02-2026

Filing Number

696/2026

Filing Date

27-Feb-2026

Registration No

470/2026

Registration Date

27-Feb-2026

Court

Principal District Court, Tiruppur

Judge

1-Principal District Judge

Decision Date

05-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--Allowed

Last updated 12-Mar-2026

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 123r/w110
Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 483

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Saran

    Adv. Gopalakrishnan R

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.State of Tamil Nadu Rep by Tiruppur CENTRAL PS (Police Station)

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 05-Mar-2026

    Copy of JudgmentView PDF

    The Principal Sessions Court, Tiruppur granted bail to Saran (25 years), who was accused of possessing 60 Tapentadol tablets for illegal sale under BNS sections 123 r/w 110, after he spent 55 days in judicial custody. The court imposed bail conditions including a Rs. 10,000 bond with two sureties, a non-refundable Rs. 5,000 deposit to the District Legal Services Authority, daily police appearance, and restrictions against tampering with evidence or absconding. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 05-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    Principal District Judge

  4. 03-Mar-2026

    Enquiry

    Principal District Judge

  5. 27-Feb-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  6. 27-Feb-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 470/2026

casestatus.in Summary

The Principal Sessions Court, Tiruppur granted bail to Saran (25 years), who was accused of possessing 60 Tapentadol tablets for illegal sale under BNS sections 123 r/w 110, after he spent 55 days in judicial custody. The court imposed bail conditions including a Rs. 10,000 bond with two sureties, a non-refundable Rs. 5,000 deposit to the District Legal Services Authority, daily police appearance, and restrictions against tampering with evidence or absconding. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case