Sub Inspector Of Police, Udumalpet Ps vs Jayaprakash — 788/2023

Case under Tn Open Places(prevention of Disfigurement) Act, 1959 Section 4(1) TNOPPD ACT. Status: Trial. Next hearing: 23rd March 2026.

STC - Small Cause Calendar case / Summary Trial Case

CNR: TNTI170069102023

Trial

Next Hearing

23rd March 2026

e-Filing Number

08-12-2023

Filing Number

6906/2023

Filing Date

09-12-2023

Registration No

788/2023

Registration Date

28-12-2023

Court

Judicial Magistrate No. I Court, Udumalpet

Judge

3-Judicial Magistrate No. I, Udumalpet

Acts & Sections

Tn Open Places(prevention of Disfigurement) Act, 1959 Section 4(1) TNOPPD ACT

Petitioner(s)

Sub Inspector Of Police, Udumalpet Ps (Police Station)

Respondent(s)

Jayaprakash

Hearing History

Judge: 3-Judicial Magistrate No. I, Udumalpet

11-03-2026

Trial

05-03-2026

Trial

06-01-2026

Trial

24-11-2025

Evidence

23-10-2025

Evidence

Interim Orders

11-03-2026
Copy of Deposition / Witness

Summary This is a deposition of witness (P.W.2) recorded in the Court of Judicial Magistrate No. I, Udumalpet in case STC No. 788/2023 on 11.03.2026. The witness, a police constable, testified regarding a complaint about an illegal party flag (approximately 20 feet long) placed on a road in violation of election rules on 23.03.2019, which was subsequently removed and seized by police. The witness's testimony was examined-in-chief and cross-examined; the deposition was then read over, found correct, and signed by the witness before the judicial magistrate. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Summary This is a deposition of witness (P.W.2) recorded in the Court of Judicial Magistrate No. I, Udumalpet in case STC No. 788/2023 on 11.03.2026. The witness, a police constable, testified regarding a complaint about an illegal party flag (approximately 20 feet long) placed on a road in violation of election rules on 23.03.2019, which was subsequently removed and seized by police. The witness's testimony was examined-in-chief and cross-examined; the deposition was then read over, found correct, and signed by the witness before the judicial magistrate. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

More from this court

Judicial Magistrate No. I Court, Udumalpet All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case