SI OF POLICE UDUMALPET vs VENGATACHALAM and 2 others — 179/2023
Case under Indian Penal Code Section 294(b),323,506(1),325,109. Status: Evidence. Next hearing: 18th May 2026.
CC - Calendar Case
CNR: TNTI170060222023
Next Hearing
18th May 2026
Filing Number
6018/2023
Filing Date
08-11-2023
Registration No
179/2023
Registration Date
08-11-2023
Court
Judicial Magistrate No. I Court, Udumalpet
Judge
3-Judicial Magistrate No. I, Udumalpet
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
SI OF POLICE UDUMALPET
Adv. APP
Respondent(s)
VENGATACHALAM and 2 others
SENTHILKUMAR
KALIMUTHU
Hearing History
Judge: 3-Judicial Magistrate No. I, Udumalpet
Evidence
Evidence
Evidence
Evidence
Evidence
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 15-04-2026 | Evidence |
| 09-03-2026 | Evidence |
| 11-02-2026 | Evidence |
| 19-01-2026 | Evidence |
| 11-12-2025 | Evidence |
Interim Orders
Summary This document records the deposition of two prosecution witnesses (P.W.1 and P.W.2) in Criminal Case No. 179/2023 before the Judicial Magistrate Court, Udumalpet. Both witnesses testified on July 14, 2025, regarding an alleged assault incident involving a land dispute where three accused individuals allegedly attacked the witnesses and their family members with a tractor and physical violence, causing injuries that required hospitalization and surgery. The court recorded their statements, which were read back and signed by the witnesses, and no cross-examination by the defence was conducted due to the defence counsel's health issues. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary This document records the deposition of two prosecution witnesses (P.W.1 and P.W.2) in Criminal Case No. 179/2023 before the Judicial Magistrate Court, Udumalpet. Both witnesses testified on July 14, 2025, regarding an alleged assault incident involving a land dispute where three accused individuals allegedly attacked the witnesses and their family members with a tractor and physical violence, causing injuries that required hospitalization and surgery. The court recorded their statements, which were read back and signed by the witnesses, and no cross-examination by the defence was conducted due to the defence counsel's health issues. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts