INSPECTOR OF POLICE, UDUMAPET PS vs MURUGAN SHIVAGURU — 147/2024
Case under Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 331(4),305,62 BNS. Status: Service Pending. Next hearing: 20th April 2026.
CC - Calendar Case
CNR: TNTI170053812024
Next Hearing
20th April 2026
e-Filing Number
09-11-2024
Filing Number
5381/2024
Filing Date
18-11-2024
Registration No
147/2024
Registration Date
18-11-2024
Court
Judicial Magistrate No. I Court, Udumalpet
Judge
3-Judicial Magistrate No. I, Udumalpet
FIR Details
FIR Number
628
Police Station
Udumalpet Police Station
Year
2024
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
INSPECTOR OF POLICE, UDUMAPET PS (Police Station)
Respondent(s)
MURUGAN SHIVAGURU
RAJA
SURESH
THANGARASU
Hearing History
Judge: 3-Judicial Magistrate No. I, Udumalpet
Service Pending
Service Pending
Service Pending
Service Pending
Service Pending
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 06-04-2026 | Service Pending |
| 23-03-2026 | Service Pending |
| 16-03-2026 | Service Pending |
| 13-03-2026 | Service Pending |
| 09-03-2026 | Service Pending |
Interim Orders
This is a Deposition of Witness (P.W.4) document from the Court of Judicial Magistrate No. I, Udumalpet, in criminal case CC No. 147/2024, dated 26.05.2025. The witness, a retired Indian Army officer, testified about an inspection conducted on 18.09.2024 regarding a theft at Sivashankaran's residence, providing details about site measurements, sketch maps, and witness signatures he provided during the investigation. The witness was cross-examined by the defense counsel regarding the authenticity and completeness of his knowledge of the documents prepared, and his testimony was recorded and signed before the Judicial Magistrate. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
This is a Deposition of Witness (P.W.4) document from the Court of Judicial Magistrate No. I, Udumalpet, in criminal case CC No. 147/2024, dated 26.05.2025. The witness, a retired Indian Army officer, testified about an inspection conducted on 18.09.2024 regarding a theft at Sivashankaran's residence, providing details about site measurements, sketch maps, and witness signatures he provided during the investigation. The witness was cross-examined by the defense counsel regarding the authenticity and completeness of his knowledge of the documents prepared, and his testimony was recorded and signed before the Judicial Magistrate. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts