SI OF POLICE UDUMALPET vs VIGNESH AND 2 OTHERS — 38/2023
Case under Indian Penal Code Section 294(b),324,506(2). Status: Evidence. Next hearing: 12th March 2026.
CC - Calendar Case
CNR: TNTI170024922023
Next Hearing
12th March 2026
Filing Number
2492/2023
Filing Date
13-04-2023
Registration No
38/2023
Registration Date
13-04-2023
Court
Judicial Magistrate No. I Court, Udumalpet
Judge
3-Judicial Magistrate No. I, Udumalpet
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
SI OF POLICE UDUMALPET
Adv. SivaGnanam Assistant Public Public Prosecutor
Respondent(s)
VIGNESH AND 2 OTHERS
MUTHURAMAN
ARUNKUMAR
Hearing History
Judge: 3-Judicial Magistrate No. I, Udumalpet
Evidence
Evidence
Evidence
Trial
Trial
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 09-03-2026 | Evidence |
| 05-03-2026 | Evidence |
| 26-02-2026 | Evidence |
| 23-01-2026 | Trial |
| 24-12-2025 | Trial |
Interim Orders
Case Summary Case No. CC 38/2023 | Judicial Magistrate Court, Udumalpet Two prosecution witnesses (P.W.1 and P.W.2) deposited their testimonies on 26.02.2026 regarding an incident from September 2017 where a flex board fell during an event, causing injuries to both witnesses. The witnesses testified that they were injured by nearby accused persons who were present and subsequently received treatment at government hospital. Both witnesses' depositions were recorded, examined by the court, cross-examined, read back to them, and accepted by the court before they affixed their signatures. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary Case No. CC 38/2023 | Judicial Magistrate Court, Udumalpet Two prosecution witnesses (P.W.1 and P.W.2) deposited their testimonies on 26.02.2026 regarding an incident from September 2017 where a flex board fell during an event, causing injuries to both witnesses. The witnesses testified that they were injured by nearby accused persons who were present and subsequently received treatment at government hospital. Both witnesses' depositions were recorded, examined by the court, cross-examined, read back to them, and accepted by the court before they affixed their signatures. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Explore other courts