Sub Inspector Of Police Amaravathinagar Ps vs Sivashanmugam — 436/2025

Case under Tn Prohibition Act Section 4(1)(C). Status: Evidence. Next hearing: 06th May 2026.

CC - Calendar Case

CNR: TNTI170018012025

Evidence

Next Hearing

06th May 2026

e-Filing Number

11-08-2025

Filing Number

1800/2025

Filing Date

14-08-2025

Registration No

436/2025

Registration Date

14-08-2025

Court

Judicial Magistrate No. I Court, Udumalpet

Judge

3-Judicial Magistrate No. I, Udumalpet

FIR Details

FIR Number

83

Police Station

Amaravathi Police Station

Year

2025

Acts & Sections

TN PROHIBITION ACT Section 4(1)(C)

Petitioner(s)

Sub Inspector Of Police Amaravathinagar Ps (Police Station)

Respondent(s)

Sivashanmugam

Hearing History

Judge: 3-Judicial Magistrate No. I, Udumalpet

06-04-2026

Evidence

23-03-2026

Evidence

09-03-2026

Evidence

09-02-2026

Evidence

21-01-2026

Evidence

Interim Orders

09-03-2026
Copy of Deposition / Witness

This is a deposition of a prosecution witness (P.W.2) in a case involving the illegal sale of liquor under the Tamil Nadu Prohibition Act at the Judicial Magistrate Court, Udumalpet (CC No.436/2025). The witness, a police officer, testified about the apprehension of two individuals with four bottles of liquor and a clay pot on 27.07.2025, and the subsequent seizure and documentation procedures. The cross-examination revealed significant gaps in the investigation, including lack of public witnesses, unclear location details, and no photographs of evidence, ultimately weakening the prosecution's case. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

This is a deposition of a prosecution witness (P.W.2) in a case involving the illegal sale of liquor under the Tamil Nadu Prohibition Act at the Judicial Magistrate Court, Udumalpet (CC No.436/2025). The witness, a police officer, testified about the apprehension of two individuals with four bottles of liquor and a clay pot on 27.07.2025, and the subsequent seizure and documentation procedures. The cross-examination revealed significant gaps in the investigation, including lack of public witnesses, unclear location details, and no photographs of evidence, ultimately weakening the prosecution's case. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

More from this court

Judicial Magistrate No. I Court, Udumalpet All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case