SI OF POLICE UDUMALPET vs NAVEENKUMAR — 283/2022

Case under Indian Penal Code Section 353,341. Disposed: Contested--Acquitted on 18th March 2026.

Case disposed

CC - Calendar Case

CNR: TNTI170017992022

Filing Number

1799/2022

Filing Date

12-Dec-2022

Registration No

283/2022

Registration Date

12-Dec-2022

Court

Judicial Magistrate No. I Court, Udumalpet

Judge

3-Judicial Magistrate No. I, Udumalpet

Decision Date

18-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--Acquitted

Last updated 19-Apr-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

222

Police Station

Udumalpet Police Station

Year

2022

Acts & Sections

Indian Penal Code Section 353,341

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.SI OF POLICE UDUMALPET

    Adv. SivaGnanam Assistant Public Public Prosecutor

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.NAVEENKUMAR

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 18-Mar-2026

    Copy of JudgmentView PDF

    Court Decision Summary The Udumalpet Magistrate Court acquitted both accused persons under Indian Penal Code Sections 353 and 341, finding insufficient evidence that they obstructed a police officer's duty or wrongfully restrained public movement during a temple procession on April 21, 2022. Although prosecution witnesses testified the accused created a dispute over procession precedence and blocked traffic, contradictions in witness accounts regarding timing and specifics, lack of public complaints, and absence of corroborating evidence prevented the court from proving guilt beyond reasonable doubt under applicable legal standards. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 18-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    Judicial Magistrate No. I, Udumalpet

  4. 09-Mar-2026

    Judgement

    Judicial Magistrate No. I, Udumalpet

  5. 04-Mar-2026

    Evidence

    Judicial Magistrate No. I, Udumalpet

  6. 02-Mar-2026

    Evidence

    Judicial Magistrate No. I, Udumalpet

  7. 18-Feb-2026

    Copy of Deposition / WitnessView PDF

  8. 18-Feb-2026

    Evidence

    Judicial Magistrate No. I, Udumalpet

  9. 05-Feb-2026

    Evidence

    Judicial Magistrate No. I, Udumalpet

  10. 21-Jan-2026

    Evidence

    Judicial Magistrate No. I, Udumalpet

  11. 20-Jan-2026

    Evidence

    Judicial Magistrate No. I, Udumalpet

  12. 11-Dec-2025

    Evidence

    Judicial Magistrate No. I, Udumalpet

  13. 04-Dec-2025

    Evidence

    Judicial Magistrate No. I, Udumalpet

  14. 18-Nov-2025

    Evidence

    Judicial Magistrate No. I, Udumalpet

  15. 30-Oct-2025

    Evidence

    Judicial Magistrate No. I, Udumalpet

  16. 14-Oct-2025

    Evidence

    Judicial Magistrate No. I, Udumalpet

  17. 09-Oct-2025

    Evidence

    Judicial Magistrate No. I, Udumalpet

  18. 22-Sep-2025

    Questioning

    Judicial Magistrate No. I, Udumalpet

  19. 17-Sep-2025

    Copy of Deposition / WitnessView PDF

  20. 17-Sep-2025

    Evidence

    Judicial Magistrate No. I, Udumalpet

  21. 18-Aug-2025

    Evidence

    Judicial Magistrate No. I, Udumalpet

  22. 30-Jul-2025

    Evidence

    Judicial Magistrate No. I, Udumalpet

  23. 23-Jul-2025

    Copy of Deposition / WitnessView PDF

  24. 23-Jul-2025

    Evidence

    Judicial Magistrate No. I, Udumalpet

  25. 24-Jun-2025

    Trial

    Judicial Magistrate No. I, Udumalpet

  26. 13-May-2025

    Trial

    Judicial Magistrate No. I, Udumalpet

  27. 07-Apr-2025

    Trial

    Judicial Magistrate No. I, Udumalpet

  28. 19-Mar-2025

    Trial

    Judicial Magistrate No. I, Udumalpet

  29. 04-Mar-2025

    Trial

    Judicial Magistrate No. I, Udumalpet

  30. 18-Feb-2025

    Copy of Deposition / WitnessView PDF

  31. 18-Feb-2025

    Trial

    Judicial Magistrate No. I, Udumalpet

  32. 27-Jan-2025

    Trial

    Judicial Magistrate No. I, Udumalpet

  33. 17-Dec-2024

    Trial

    Judicial Magistrate No. I, Udumalpet

  34. 18-Nov-2024

    Trial

    Judicial Magistrate No. I, Udumalpet

  35. 04-Nov-2024

    Trial

    Judicial Magistrate No. I, Udumalpet

  36. 08-Oct-2024

    Trial

    Judicial Magistrate No. I, Udumalpet

  37. 17-Sep-2024

    Trial

    Judicial Magistrate No. I, Udumalpet

  38. 27-Aug-2024

    Trial

    Judicial Magistrate No. I, Udumalpet

  39. 08-Aug-2024

    Trial

    Judicial Magistrate No. I, Udumalpet

  40. 29-Jul-2024

    Trial

    Judicial Magistrate No. I, Udumalpet

  41. 11-Jul-2024

    Trial

    Judicial Magistrate No. I, Udumalpet

  42. 08-Jul-2024

    Copy of Deposition / WitnessView PDF

  43. 08-Jul-2024

    Trial

    Judicial Magistrate No. I, Udumalpet

  44. 21-Jun-2024

    Trial

    Judicial Magistrate No. I, Udumalpet

  45. 23-May-2024

    Copy of Deposition / WitnessView PDF

  46. 23-May-2024

    Trial

    Judicial Magistrate No. I, Udumalpet

  47. 26-Mar-2024

    Trial

    Judicial Magistrate No. I, Udumalpet

  48. 02-Jan-2024

    Trial

    Judicial Magistrate No. I, Udumalpet

  49. 09-Nov-2023

    Trial

    Judicial Magistrate No. I, Udumalpet

  50. 24-Aug-2023

    Trial

    Judicial Magistrate No. I, Udumalpet

  51. 19-Jun-2023

    Trial

    Judicial Magistrate No. I, Udumalpet

  52. 18-May-2023

    Trial

    Judicial Magistrate No. I, Udumalpet

  53. 24-Apr-2023

    Copy of Deposition / WitnessView PDF

  54. 24-Apr-2023

    Trial

    Judicial Magistrate No. I, Udumalpet

  55. 21-Mar-2023

    Trial

    Judicial Magistrate No. I, Udumalpet

  56. 10-Mar-2023

    Questioning

    Judicial Magistrate No. I, Udumalpet

  57. 10-Feb-2023

    Issue of Service

    Judicial Magistrate No. I, Udumalpet

  58. 12-Dec-2022

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  59. 12-Dec-2022

    Case filed

    Registration No. 283/2022

casestatus.in Summary

Court Decision Summary The Udumalpet Magistrate Court acquitted both accused persons under Indian Penal Code Sections 353 and 341, finding insufficient evidence that they obstructed a police officer's duty or wrongfully restrained public movement during a temple procession on April 21, 2022. Although prosecution witnesses testified the accused created a dispute over procession precedence and blocked traffic, contradictions in witness accounts regarding timing and specifics, lack of public complaints, and absence of corroborating evidence prevented the court from proving guilt beyond reasonable doubt under applicable legal standards. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case