SUB INSPECTOR OF POLICE, UDUMALPET PS K vs ASKAR BASHA — 386/2025
Case under Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 331(4),305(a)BNS. Status: Evidence. Next hearing: 12th March 2026.
CC - Calendar Case
CNR: TNTI170015712025
Next Hearing
12th March 2026
e-Filing Number
16-07-2025
Filing Number
1570/2025
Filing Date
16-07-2025
Registration No
386/2025
Registration Date
16-07-2025
Court
Judicial Magistrate No. I Court, Udumalpet
Judge
3-Judicial Magistrate No. I, Udumalpet
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
SUB INSPECTOR OF POLICE, UDUMALPET PS (Police Station) K
Respondent(s)
ASKAR BASHA
Hearing History
Judge: 3-Judicial Magistrate No. I, Udumalpet
Evidence
Evidence
Evidence
Evidence
Evidence
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 05-03-2026 | Evidence |
| 02-03-2026 | Evidence |
| 26-02-2026 | Evidence |
| 28-01-2026 | Evidence |
| 19-01-2026 | Evidence |
Interim Orders
Summary This document contains witness depositions in a criminal case (CC No. 386/2025) from the Judicial Magistrate Court in Udumalpet, Tamil Nadu. The case involves a jewelry shop theft that occurred on April 3-4, 2025, where ₹19,000 in cash, 158 gold coins, and 75 silver coins were stolen. Two prosecution witnesses testified: the shop owner (P.W.5) who detailed the burglary and recovery of stolen items, and a police forensic officer (P.W.6) who described the arrest of the accused (a repeat offender) through CCTV evidence, fingerprint matching, and recovered stolen items. Both witnesses were cross-examined and their testimonies were recorded and signed before the judge. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary This document contains witness depositions in a criminal case (CC No. 386/2025) from the Judicial Magistrate Court in Udumalpet, Tamil Nadu. The case involves a jewelry shop theft that occurred on April 3-4, 2025, where ₹19,000 in cash, 158 gold coins, and 75 silver coins were stolen. Two prosecution witnesses testified: the shop owner (P.W.5) who detailed the burglary and recovery of stolen items, and a police forensic officer (P.W.6) who described the arrest of the accused (a repeat offender) through CCTV evidence, fingerprint matching, and recovered stolen items. Both witnesses were cross-examined and their testimonies were recorded and signed before the judge. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Explore other courts