Inspector of Police udumalpet vs Narayanan — 551/2025
Case under Tn Prohibition Act Section 4(1)(a). Disposed: Uncontested--Withdrawn on 05th March 2026.
STC - Small Cause Calendar case / Summary Trial Case
CNR: TNTI170014092025
Filing Number
1408/2025
Filing Date
27-Jun-2025
Registration No
551/2025
Registration Date
27-Jun-2025
Court
Judicial Magistrate No. I Court, Udumalpet
Judge
3-Judicial Magistrate No. I, Udumalpet
Decision Date
05-Mar-2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--Withdrawn
Last updated 12-Mar-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.Inspector of Police udumalpet
Adv. Assistant Public Prosecutor
Respondent(s)
-
1.Narayanan
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
05-Mar-2026
Copy of JudgmentView PDF
Summary: The Judicial Magistrate Court in Udumalpet withdrew the case against Narayanan under Section 4(1)(i) of the Tamil Nadu Prohibition Act due to the complainant police's failure to serve the summons on the accused despite issuing notice under Section 258 CrPC. The court discharged the accused but reserved the right to retry him later if his presence is secured with court consent. Seized liquor and cash (Rs. 150) were ordered confiscated to the Government. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
05-Mar-2026
Disposed
Judicial Magistrate No. I, Udumalpet
-
05-Feb-2026
Issue of Service
Judicial Magistrate No. I, Udumalpet
-
29-Dec-2025
Issue of Service
Judicial Magistrate No. I, Udumalpet
-
02-Dec-2025
Issue of Service
Judicial Magistrate No. I, Udumalpet
-
14-Oct-2025
Issue of Service
Judicial Magistrate No. I, Udumalpet
-
12-Sep-2025
Issue of Service
Judicial Magistrate No. I, Udumalpet
-
27-Jun-2025
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
27-Jun-2025
Case filed
Registration No. 551/2025
Summary: The Judicial Magistrate Court in Udumalpet withdrew the case against Narayanan under Section 4(1)(i) of the Tamil Nadu Prohibition Act due to the complainant police's failure to serve the summons on the accused despite issuing notice under Section 258 CrPC. The court discharged the accused but reserved the right to retry him later if his presence is secured with court consent. Seized liquor and cash (Rs. 150) were ordered confiscated to the Government. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts