Sub Inspector Of Police, Udumalpet Ps vs KATTURAJA — 283/2025
Case under Tn Prohibition Act Section 4(1)(C)TNPACT. Disposed: Contested--Acquitted on 27th March 2026.
CC - Calendar Case
CNR: TNTI170012052025
e-Filing Number
02-04-2025
Filing Number
1204/2025
Filing Date
25-06-2025
Registration No
283/2025
Registration Date
27-06-2025
Court
Judicial Magistrate No. I Court, Udumalpet
Judge
3-Judicial Magistrate No. I, Udumalpet
Decision Date
27th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--Acquitted
FIR Details
FIR Number
153
Police Station
Udumalpet Police Station
Year
2025
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Sub Inspector Of Police, Udumalpet Ps (Police Station)
Respondent(s)
KATTURAJA
Hearing History
Judge: 3-Judicial Magistrate No. I, Udumalpet
Disposed
Judgement
Judgement
Questioning
Trial
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 27-03-2026 | Disposed | |
| 26-03-2026 | Judgement | |
| 18-03-2026 | Judgement | |
| 09-03-2026 | Questioning | |
| 07-01-2026 | Trial |
Final Orders / Judgements
Summary The Udumalpet Judicial Magistrate acquitted the accused Katturaja under Section 4(1)(c) of the Tamil Nadu Prohibition Act, finding that the prosecution failed to prove the charges beyond reasonable doubt. The court noted critical gaps in the investigation, including the failure to examine independent witnesses, inconsistencies in the testimonies of the two police witnesses regarding the location and number of people present at the scene, and the absence of proper documentation of the alleged illegal liquor bottles seized. The acquittal was ordered under Section 248(1) of the Criminal Procedure Code, 1973. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Interim Orders
Summary The Udumalpet Judicial Magistrate acquitted the accused Katturaja under Section 4(1)(c) of the Tamil Nadu Prohibition Act, finding that the prosecution failed to prove the charges beyond reasonable doubt. The court noted critical gaps in the investigation, including the failure to examine independent witnesses, inconsistencies in the testimonies of the two police witnesses regarding the location and number of people present at the scene, and the absence of proper documentation of the alleged illegal liquor bottles seized. The acquittal was ordered under Section 248(1) of the Criminal Procedure Code, 1973. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts