Sub Inspector Of Police, Udumalpet Ps vs SENTHIL — 370/2025
Case under Narcotic Drugs & Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985 Section 8(c) 20 (b) (ii) (A) NDPS ACT. Status: Evidence. Next hearing: 23rd March 2026.
STC - Small Cause Calendar case / Summary Trial Case
CNR: TNTI170009382025
Next Hearing
23rd March 2026
e-Filing Number
19-05-2025
Filing Number
937/2025
Filing Date
12-06-2025
Registration No
370/2025
Registration Date
12-06-2025
Court
Judicial Magistrate No. I Court, Udumalpet
Judge
3-Judicial Magistrate No. I, Udumalpet
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Sub Inspector Of Police, Udumalpet Ps (Police Station)
Respondent(s)
SENTHIL
Hearing History
Judge: 3-Judicial Magistrate No. I, Udumalpet
Evidence
Evidence
Trial
Trial
Trial
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 05-03-2026 | Evidence |
| 19-02-2026 | Evidence |
| 24-12-2025 | Trial |
| 06-11-2025 | Trial |
| 17-09-2025 | Trial |
Interim Orders
This is a witness deposition document (Judicial Form No. 53) from the Court of Judicial Magistrate No. I, Udumalpet, filed on 19.02.2026 in case STC No. 370/2024. The prosecution witness (a police constable) testified regarding the seizure of 80 grams of cannabis from the accused Viswanathan on 06.08.2021, detailing the circumstances of the arrest, the drug seizure procedure, and chain of custody documentation. The defense cross-examined the witness challenging the location and timing of the incident and the credibility of the evidence. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
This is a witness deposition document (Judicial Form No. 53) from the Court of Judicial Magistrate No. I, Udumalpet, filed on 19.02.2026 in case STC No. 370/2024. The prosecution witness (a police constable) testified regarding the seizure of 80 grams of cannabis from the accused Viswanathan on 06.08.2021, detailing the circumstances of the arrest, the drug seizure procedure, and chain of custody documentation. The defense cross-examined the witness challenging the location and timing of the incident and the credibility of the evidence. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Explore other courts