State government rep by Food Safety Officer,Udumalpet vs A.Ramanathan — 666/2019
Case under Food Safety and Standards Act 2006 Section 59(i). Disposed: Contested--Acquitted on 17th April 2026.
STC - Small Cause Calendar case / Summary Trial Case
CNR: TNTI170009222019
Filing Number
922/2019
Filing Date
07-Nov-2019
Registration No
666/2019
Registration Date
08-Nov-2019
Court
Judicial Magistrate No. I Court, Udumalpet
Judge
3-Judicial Magistrate No. I, Udumalpet
Decision Date
17-Apr-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--Acquitted
Last updated 19-Apr-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.State government rep by Food Safety Officer,Udumalpet
Adv. APP
Respondent(s)
-
1.A.Ramanathan
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
17-Apr-2026
Copy of JudgmentView PDF
Summary The court acquitted A. Ramanathan (defendant), a bakery owner, of charges under Food Safety and Standards Act 2006, Section 59(i), finding that the government failed to prove the case beyond reasonable doubt. While the food analyst's report confirmed that tea dust samples contained unauthorized artificial coloring agents (making them "unsafe"), the court noted critical procedural failures including: massive delays in analysis (10+ months instead of the mandated 14 days), failure to examine the food analyst as a witness, contradictory testimonies from government witnesses, and insufficient evidence that the defendant knowingly sold unsafe food. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
17-Apr-2026
Disposed
Judicial Magistrate No. I, Udumalpet
-
06-Apr-2026
Judgement
Judicial Magistrate No. I, Udumalpet
-
30-Mar-2026
Evidence
Judicial Magistrate No. I, Udumalpet
-
26-Mar-2026
Evidence
Judicial Magistrate No. I, Udumalpet
-
24-Mar-2026
Evidence
Judicial Magistrate No. I, Udumalpet
-
17-Mar-2026
Evidence
Judicial Magistrate No. I, Udumalpet
-
09-Mar-2026
Questioning
Judicial Magistrate No. I, Udumalpet
-
04-Mar-2026
Copy of Deposition / WitnessView PDF
-
04-Mar-2026
Questioning
Judicial Magistrate No. I, Udumalpet
-
02-Mar-2026
Evidence
Judicial Magistrate No. I, Udumalpet
-
16-Feb-2026
Evidence
Judicial Magistrate No. I, Udumalpet
-
28-Jan-2026
Evidence
Judicial Magistrate No. I, Udumalpet
-
30-Dec-2025
Evidence
Judicial Magistrate No. I, Udumalpet
-
19-Nov-2025
Trial
Judicial Magistrate No. I, Udumalpet
-
17-Nov-2025
Trial
Judicial Magistrate No. I, Udumalpet
-
03-Nov-2025
Trial
Judicial Magistrate No. I, Udumalpet
-
08-Oct-2025
Copy of Deposition / WitnessView PDF
-
08-Oct-2025
Trial
Judicial Magistrate No. I, Udumalpet
-
08-Sep-2025
Trial
Judicial Magistrate No. I, Udumalpet
-
07-Aug-2025
Trial
Judicial Magistrate No. I, Udumalpet
-
21-Jul-2025
Trial
Judicial Magistrate No. I, Udumalpet
-
18-Jun-2025
Trial
Judicial Magistrate No. I, Udumalpet
-
28-May-2025
Trial
Judicial Magistrate No. I, Udumalpet
-
24-Apr-2025
Trial
Judicial Magistrate No. I, Udumalpet
-
21-Apr-2025
Trial
Judicial Magistrate No. I, Udumalpet
-
07-Apr-2025
Trial
Judicial Magistrate No. I, Udumalpet
-
10-Mar-2025
Trial
Judicial Magistrate No. I, Udumalpet
-
05-Mar-2025
Trial
Judicial Magistrate No. I, Udumalpet
-
24-Feb-2025
Copy of Deposition / WitnessView PDF
-
24-Feb-2025
Trial
Judicial Magistrate No. I, Udumalpet
-
29-Jan-2025
Trial
Judicial Magistrate No. I, Udumalpet
-
13-Dec-2024
Trial
Judicial Magistrate No. I, Udumalpet
-
27-Nov-2024
Trial
Judicial Magistrate No. I, Udumalpet
-
06-Nov-2024
Trial
Judicial Magistrate No. I, Udumalpet
-
10-Oct-2024
Trial
Judicial Magistrate No. I, Udumalpet
-
12-Sep-2024
Trial
Judicial Magistrate No. I, Udumalpet
-
22-Aug-2024
Trial
Judicial Magistrate No. I, Udumalpet
-
23-Jul-2024
Trial
Judicial Magistrate No. I, Udumalpet
-
13-Jun-2024
Trial
Judicial Magistrate No. I, Udumalpet
-
03-May-2024
Trial
Judicial Magistrate No. I, Udumalpet
-
19-Mar-2024
Trial
Judicial Magistrate No. I, Udumalpet
-
27-Dec-2023
Trial
Judicial Magistrate No. I, Udumalpet
-
09-Nov-2023
Trial
Judicial Magistrate No. I, Udumalpet
-
29-Sep-2023
Trial
Judicial Magistrate No. I, Udumalpet
-
10-Aug-2023
Trial
Judicial Magistrate No. I, Udumalpet
-
15-Jun-2023
Trial
Judicial Magistrate No. I, Udumalpet
-
27-Apr-2023
Trial
Judicial Magistrate No. I, Udumalpet
-
09-Mar-2023
Trial
Judicial Magistrate No. I, Udumalpet
-
19-Jan-2023
Trial
Judicial Magistrate No. I, Udumalpet
-
15-Dec-2022
Trial
Judicial Magistrate No. I, Udumalpet
-
10-Nov-2022
Trial
Judicial Magistrate No. I, Udumalpet
-
18-Oct-2022
Trial
Judicial Magistrate No. I, Udumalpet
-
17-Aug-2022
Trial
Judicial Magistrate No. I, Udumalpet
-
27-Jun-2022
Trial
Judicial Magistrate No. I, Udumalpet
-
19-May-2022
Trial
Judicial Magistrate No. I, Udumalpet
-
27-Apr-2022
Trial
Judicial Magistrate No. I, Udumalpet
-
08-Mar-2022
Trial
Judicial Magistrate No. I, Udumalpet
-
31-Jan-2022
Trial
Judicial Magistrate No. I, Udumalpet
-
17-Dec-2021
Trial
Judicial Magistrate No. I, Udumalpet
-
12-Nov-2021
Trial
Judicial Magistrate No. I, Udumalpet
-
30-Sep-2021
Trial
Judicial Magistrate No. I, Udumalpet
-
16-Aug-2021
Trial
Judicial Magistrate No. I, Udumalpet
-
28-Jun-2021
Trial
Judicial Magistrate No. I, Udumalpet
-
13-May-2021
Trial
Judicial Magistrate No. I, Udumalpet
-
25-Mar-2021
Trial
-
25-Feb-2021
Trial
-
25-Jan-2021
Trial
-
28-Dec-2020
Trial
-
10-Nov-2020
Trial
-
18-Sep-2020
Trial
-
31-Jul-2020
Trial
-
12-Jun-2020
Trial
-
15-May-2020
Trial
-
27-Apr-2020
Trial
-
16-Mar-2020
Trial
-
17-Feb-2020
Trial
-
04-Jan-2020
Trial
-
26-Dec-2019
Questioning
-
17-Dec-2019
Questioning
-
08-Nov-2019
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
07-Nov-2019
Case filed
Registration No. 666/2019
Summary The court acquitted A. Ramanathan (defendant), a bakery owner, of charges under Food Safety and Standards Act 2006, Section 59(i), finding that the government failed to prove the case beyond reasonable doubt. While the food analyst's report confirmed that tea dust samples contained unauthorized artificial coloring agents (making them "unsafe"), the court noted critical procedural failures including: massive delays in analysis (10+ months instead of the mandated 14 days), failure to examine the food analyst as a witness, contradictory testimonies from government witnesses, and insufficient evidence that the defendant knowingly sold unsafe food. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts