State Government,Inspector of police,Amaravathinagar P.S vs Dhanasekaran and 3 others — 58/2019
Case under Indian Penal Code Section 341,294(b),323,506(2),326. Status: Evidence. Next hearing: 26th March 2026.
CC - Calendar Case
CNR: TNTI170004692019
Next Hearing
26th March 2026
Filing Number
469/2019
Filing Date
18-06-2019
Registration No
58/2019
Registration Date
24-06-2019
Court
Judicial Magistrate No. I Court, Udumalpet
Judge
3-Judicial Magistrate No. I, Udumalpet
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
State Government,Inspector of police,Amaravathinagar P.S
Adv. APP
Respondent(s)
Dhanasekaran and 3 others
Karuppannan
Sabarinathan
Karthikkumar
Hearing History
Judge: 3-Judicial Magistrate No. I, Udumalpet
Evidence
Evidence
Evidence
Evidence
Evidence
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 05-03-2026 | Evidence |
| 12-02-2026 | Evidence |
| 02-02-2026 | Evidence |
| 21-01-2026 | Evidence |
| 08-01-2026 | Evidence |
Interim Orders
Summary: This is a witness deposition (P.W.) recorded in Criminal Case No. 58/2019 before the Judicial Magistrate Court at Udumalpet. The prosecution witness testified about an alleged assault incident occurring on 18.09.2018 where the victim (Murugan) was attacked by multiple persons including Sabrinathan, Karthik Kumar, and others using an iron rod. During cross-examination, the defense challenged the witness's credibility regarding his presence at the scene, knowledge of the accused, and consistency of his statement with earlier police interrogation. The witness testimony was recorded, transcribed, read back to the witness for confirmation, and signed before the court on 22.10.2025. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary: This is a witness deposition (P.W.) recorded in Criminal Case No. 58/2019 before the Judicial Magistrate Court at Udumalpet. The prosecution witness testified about an alleged assault incident occurring on 18.09.2018 where the victim (Murugan) was attacked by multiple persons including Sabrinathan, Karthik Kumar, and others using an iron rod. During cross-examination, the defense challenged the witness's credibility regarding his presence at the scene, knowledge of the accused, and consistency of his statement with earlier police interrogation. The witness testimony was recorded, transcribed, read back to the witness for confirmation, and signed before the court on 22.10.2025. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Explore other courts