Rahupathy vs Inspector of police Udumalpet — 184/2026

Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 497. Disposed: Contested--Dismissed on 05th March 2026.

Case disposed

CRLMP - Criminal Miscellaneous Petition

CNR: TNTI170003952026

Filing Number

394/2026

Filing Date

04-Mar-2026

Registration No

184/2026

Registration Date

04-Mar-2026

Court

Judicial Magistrate No. I Court, Udumalpet

Judge

3-Judicial Magistrate No. I, Udumalpet

Decision Date

05-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--Dismissed

Last updated 12-Mar-2026

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 497

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Rahupathy

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Inspector of police Udumalpet

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 05-Mar-2026

    Copy of JudgmentView PDF

    Summary The Judicial Magistrate Court rejected the petitioner's request to release a TATA Motors tipper vehicle (bearing registration TN 99 Z 4717) seized in connection with illegal mining under Section 305(e) BNS and the Mines and Minerals Development and Regulation Act, 1957. Although the petitioner argued he was the vehicle owner with proper documentation and offered undertakings, the court dismissed the petition, finding merit in the prosecution's contention that releasing the vehicle could facilitate evidence tampering, vehicle modification/sale, and non-compliance with trial proceedings. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 05-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    Judicial Magistrate No. I, Udumalpet

  4. 04-Mar-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  5. 04-Mar-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 184/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Summary The Judicial Magistrate Court rejected the petitioner's request to release a TATA Motors tipper vehicle (bearing registration TN 99 Z 4717) seized in connection with illegal mining under Section 305(e) BNS and the Mines and Minerals Development and Regulation Act, 1957. Although the petitioner argued he was the vehicle owner with proper documentation and offered undertakings, the court dismissed the petition, finding merit in the prosecution's contention that releasing the vehicle could facilitate evidence tampering, vehicle modification/sale, and non-compliance with trial proceedings. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case