A1. Ahamed Yasin vs Inspector of Police, Udumalpet — 183/2026

Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 480. Disposed: Contested--Allowed on 09th March 2026.

Case disposed

CRLMP - Criminal Miscellaneous Petition

CNR: TNTI170003942026

Filing Number

393/2026

Filing Date

03-Mar-2026

Registration No

183/2026

Registration Date

03-Mar-2026

Court

Judicial Magistrate No. I Court, Udumalpet

Judge

3-Judicial Magistrate No. I, Udumalpet

Decision Date

09-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--Allowed

Last updated 19-Apr-2026

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 480

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.A1. Ahamed Yasin

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Inspector of Police, Udumalpet

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 09-Mar-2026

    Copy of JudgmentView PDF

    The Judicial Magistrate granted bail to Ahamed Yasin, accused under Section 304(2) BNS Act (causing death by negligence), after he spent 20 days in judicial custody. Despite police objections citing his involvement in 12 prior cases and absconding risks, the court found the circumstances favored bail. The accused was released on bail with stringent conditions including a Rs. 10,000 bond with two sureties, daily court appearance, non-absconding, and restrictions against tampering with evidence or committing similar offences. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 09-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    Judicial Magistrate No. I, Udumalpet

  4. 07-Mar-2026

    Issue of Service

    Judicial Magistrate No. I, Udumalpet

  5. 04-Mar-2026

    Issue of Service

    Judicial Magistrate No. I, Udumalpet

  6. 03-Mar-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  7. 03-Mar-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 183/2026

casestatus.in Summary

The Judicial Magistrate granted bail to Ahamed Yasin, accused under Section 304(2) BNS Act (causing death by negligence), after he spent 20 days in judicial custody. Despite police objections citing his involvement in 12 prior cases and absconding risks, the court found the circumstances favored bail. The accused was released on bail with stringent conditions including a Rs. 10,000 bond with two sureties, daily court appearance, non-absconding, and restrictions against tampering with evidence or committing similar offences. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case