N.Anandhan vs J.S.Senthilkumar — 241/2019
Case under Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 Section 138. Status: Judgement. Next hearing: 27th April 2026.
STC - Small Cause Calendar case / Summary Trial Case
CNR: TNTI170003632019
Next Hearing
27th April 2026
Filing Number
363/2019
Filing Date
09-05-2019
Registration No
241/2019
Registration Date
22-05-2019
Court
Judicial Magistrate No. I Court, Udumalpet
Judge
3-Judicial Magistrate No. I, Udumalpet
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
N.Anandhan
Adv. Raghunath S S
Respondent(s)
J.S.Senthilkumar
Hearing History
Judge: 3-Judicial Magistrate No. I, Udumalpet
Judgement
Arguments
Arguments
Arguments
Arguments
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 15-04-2026 | Judgement |
| 06-04-2026 | Arguments |
| 24-03-2026 | Arguments |
| 23-03-2026 | Arguments |
| 17-03-2026 | Arguments |
Interim Orders
SUMMARY: This is a witness deposition document (Judicial Form No. 53) from the Court of Judicial Magistrate No. I, Udumalpet in case STC No. 241/2019. The witness (P.W.3) was examined regarding a promissory note dated 22.10.2018 prepared at a lawyer's office, and during cross-examination, the witness admitted lacking proper authorization to draft such documents and acknowledged discrepancies regarding the document's authenticity and preparation details. The deposition was recorded and the witness's testimony was transcribed, read back, and signed before the magistrate. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
SUMMARY: This is a witness deposition document (Judicial Form No. 53) from the Court of Judicial Magistrate No. I, Udumalpet in case STC No. 241/2019. The witness (P.W.3) was examined regarding a promissory note dated 22.10.2018 prepared at a lawyer's office, and during cross-examination, the witness admitted lacking proper authorization to draft such documents and acknowledged discrepancies regarding the document's authenticity and preparation details. The deposition was recorded and the witness's testimony was transcribed, read back, and signed before the magistrate. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts