state government rep by FRO,udumalpet vs Vellisamy and 3 others — 79/2021
Case under Indian Wildlife (Protection) Act, 1972 Section 29,39(3),(a). Status: Evidence. Next hearing: 30th March 2026.
CC - Calendar Case
CNR: TNTI170003562021
Next Hearing
30th March 2026
Filing Number
356/2021
Filing Date
23-12-2021
Registration No
79/2021
Registration Date
23-12-2021
Court
Judicial Magistrate No. I Court, Udumalpet
Judge
3-Judicial Magistrate No. I, Udumalpet
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
state government rep by FRO,udumalpet
Adv. APP
Respondent(s)
Vellisamy and 3 others
Thiruman
chinnathangam
Velu
Hearing History
Judge: 3-Judicial Magistrate No. I, Udumalpet
Evidence
Evidence
Evidence
Evidence
Evidence
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 11-03-2026 | Evidence |
| 09-03-2026 | Evidence |
| 05-03-2026 | Evidence |
| 12-02-2026 | Evidence |
| 29-01-2026 | Evidence |
Interim Orders
Summary This is a deposition of witness (P.W.1) in Criminal Case No. 79/2021 before the Judicial Magistrate, Udumalpet. The witness, a forest guard, testified on 26.03.2025 regarding the discovery of a dead wild elephant in the forest on 29.08.2021, the subsequent investigation involving recovery of a bullet from the carcass, and the arrest of two accused persons (Velu and Chinnathandgam) who confessed to poaching. The witness's examination-in-chief and cross-examination were completed, and the deposition was recorded and authenticated by the Judicial Officer. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary This is a deposition of witness (P.W.1) in Criminal Case No. 79/2021 before the Judicial Magistrate, Udumalpet. The witness, a forest guard, testified on 26.03.2025 regarding the discovery of a dead wild elephant in the forest on 29.08.2021, the subsequent investigation involving recovery of a bullet from the carcass, and the arrest of two accused persons (Velu and Chinnathandgam) who confessed to poaching. The witness's examination-in-chief and cross-examination were completed, and the deposition was recorded and authenticated by the Judicial Officer. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Explore other courts