Inspector of police vs Subramani — 39/2022
Case under Indian Penal Code Section 279,304(A). Status: Trial. Next hearing: 20th April 2026.
CC - Calendar Case
CNR: TNTI170001822022
Next Hearing
20th April 2026
Filing Number
182/2022
Filing Date
23-02-2022
Registration No
39/2022
Registration Date
23-02-2022
Court
Judicial Magistrate No. I Court, Udumalpet
Judge
3-Judicial Magistrate No. I, Udumalpet
FIR Details
FIR Number
124
Police Station
Udumalpet Police Station
Year
2021
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Inspector of police
Adv. SivaGnanam Assistant Public Public Prosecutor
Respondent(s)
Subramani
Hearing History
Judge: 3-Judicial Magistrate No. I, Udumalpet
Trial
Trial
Evidence
Evidence
Evidence
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 09-03-2026 | Trial |
| 04-02-2026 | Trial |
| 18-12-2025 | Evidence |
| 27-11-2025 | Evidence |
| 03-11-2025 | Evidence |
Interim Orders
Case Summary: This document contains witness depositions (P.W.1-P.W.4) recorded on 05.08.2024 before the Judicial Magistrate Court No.I, Udumalpet in Criminal Case No. 39/2022. The witnesses testified regarding a fatal road accident on 07.03.2021 where a TATA ACE vehicle collided with a two-wheeler, resulting in the death of the victim. The prosecution witnesses consistently stated that the TATA ACE driver was negligent and driving recklessly at high speed, while the defense cross-examination challenged the credibility of their accounts and raised questions about the victim's own driving without a valid license. No final judgment or order was issued—this document records only the examination-in-chief and cross-examination of prosecution witnesses during trial proceedings. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary: This document contains witness depositions (P.W.1-P.W.4) recorded on 05.08.2024 before the Judicial Magistrate Court No.I, Udumalpet in Criminal Case No. 39/2022. The witnesses testified regarding a fatal road accident on 07.03.2021 where a TATA ACE vehicle collided with a two-wheeler, resulting in the death of the victim. The prosecution witnesses consistently stated that the TATA ACE driver was negligent and driving recklessly at high speed, while the defense cross-examination challenged the credibility of their accounts and raised questions about the victim's own driving without a valid license. No final judgment or order was issued—this document records only the examination-in-chief and cross-examination of prosecution witnesses during trial proceedings. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts