Sasikumar vs Selvam alias Muthusamy — 33/2026

Case under Code of Criminal Procedure Section 91. Disposed: Uncontested--Dismissed on 05th March 2026.

Case disposed

CRLMP - Criminal Miscellaneous Petition

CNR: TNTI170000972026

Filing Number

97/2026

Filing Date

09-Jan-2026

Registration No

33/2026

Registration Date

09-Jan-2026

Court

Judicial Magistrate No. I Court, Udumalpet

Judge

3-Judicial Magistrate No. I, Udumalpet

Decision Date

05-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--Dismissed

Last updated 12-Mar-2026

Acts & Sections

Code of Criminal Procedure Section 91

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Sasikumar

    Adv. Chidambarasamy C

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Selvam alias Muthusamy

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 05-Mar-2026

    Copy of JudgmentView PDF

    The Judicial Magistrate Court dismissed the Criminal Miscellaneous Petition filed under Section 91 of the Criminal Procedure Code, 1973, holding that the petition was not maintainable. The court reasoned that since the original case had been pending since 2019 (approximately 7 years), the complainant had already been cross-examined three times, and sufficient opportunities had been provided to the accused to examine evidence, further proceedings would serve no purpose and would be contrary to the interests of justice. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 05-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    Judicial Magistrate No. I, Udumalpet

  4. 20-Feb-2026

    Orders

    Judicial Magistrate No. I, Udumalpet

  5. 11-Feb-2026

    Enquiry

    Judicial Magistrate No. I, Udumalpet

  6. 03-Feb-2026

    Enquiry

    Judicial Magistrate No. I, Udumalpet

  7. 20-Jan-2026

    Counter

    Judicial Magistrate No. I, Udumalpet

  8. 09-Jan-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  9. 09-Jan-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 33/2026

casestatus.in Summary

The Judicial Magistrate Court dismissed the Criminal Miscellaneous Petition filed under Section 91 of the Criminal Procedure Code, 1973, holding that the petition was not maintainable. The court reasoned that since the original case had been pending since 2019 (approximately 7 years), the complainant had already been cross-examined three times, and sufficient opportunities had been provided to the accused to examine evidence, further proceedings would serve no purpose and would be contrary to the interests of justice. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case