Sasikumar vs Selvam alias Muthusamy — 32/2026
Case under Code of Criminal Procedure Section reopen. Disposed: Uncontested--Dismissed on 05th March 2026.
CRLMP - Criminal Miscellaneous Petition
CNR: TNTI170000962026
Filing Number
96/2026
Filing Date
09-01-2026
Registration No
32/2026
Registration Date
09-01-2026
Court
Judicial Magistrate No. I Court, Udumalpet
Judge
3-Judicial Magistrate No. I, Udumalpet
Decision Date
05th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--Dismissed
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Sasikumar
Adv. Chidambarasamy C
Respondent(s)
Selvam alias Muthusamy
Hearing History
Judge: 3-Judicial Magistrate No. I, Udumalpet
Disposed
Orders
Enquiry
Enquiry
Counter
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 05-03-2026 | Disposed |
| 20-02-2026 | Orders |
| 11-02-2026 | Enquiry |
| 03-02-2026 | Enquiry |
| 20-01-2026 | Counter |
Final Orders / Judgements
Court Decision Summary The court dismissed the petitioner's application for remand of the original case (Crl.M.P. No. 32/2026). The court found that the complainant had already been cross-examined three times on dates 28.09.2022, 13.03.2023, and 02.05.2023 over approximately 30 hours, providing sufficient opportunity to raise questions about alleged financial transactions and income tax issues. The court reasoned that allowing further remand would be contrary to justice, especially since the case has been pending since 2019 for approximately seven years, and deemed the petition an abuse of process. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Court Decision Summary The court dismissed the petitioner's application for remand of the original case (Crl.M.P. No. 32/2026). The court found that the complainant had already been cross-examined three times on dates 28.09.2022, 13.03.2023, and 02.05.2023 over approximately 30 hours, providing sufficient opportunity to raise questions about alleged financial transactions and income tax issues. The court reasoned that allowing further remand would be contrary to justice, especially since the case has been pending since 2019 for approximately seven years, and deemed the petition an abuse of process. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Explore other courts