Sasikumar vs Selvam alias Muthusamy — 32/2026

Case under Code of Criminal Procedure Section reopen. Disposed: Uncontested--Dismissed on 05th March 2026.

Case disposed

CRLMP - Criminal Miscellaneous Petition

CNR: TNTI170000962026

Filing Number

96/2026

Filing Date

09-Jan-2026

Registration No

32/2026

Registration Date

09-Jan-2026

Court

Judicial Magistrate No. I Court, Udumalpet

Judge

3-Judicial Magistrate No. I, Udumalpet

Decision Date

05-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--Dismissed

Last updated 12-Mar-2026

Acts & Sections

Code of Criminal Procedure Section reopen

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Sasikumar

    Adv. Chidambarasamy C

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Selvam alias Muthusamy

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 05-Mar-2026

    Copy of JudgmentView PDF

    Court Decision Summary The court dismissed the petitioner's application for remand of the original case (Crl.M.P. No. 32/2026). The court found that the complainant had already been cross-examined three times on dates 28.09.2022, 13.03.2023, and 02.05.2023 over approximately 30 hours, providing sufficient opportunity to raise questions about alleged financial transactions and income tax issues. The court reasoned that allowing further remand would be contrary to justice, especially since the case has been pending since 2019 for approximately seven years, and deemed the petition an abuse of process. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 05-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    Judicial Magistrate No. I, Udumalpet

  4. 20-Feb-2026

    Orders

    Judicial Magistrate No. I, Udumalpet

  5. 11-Feb-2026

    Enquiry

    Judicial Magistrate No. I, Udumalpet

  6. 03-Feb-2026

    Enquiry

    Judicial Magistrate No. I, Udumalpet

  7. 20-Jan-2026

    Counter

    Judicial Magistrate No. I, Udumalpet

  8. 09-Jan-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  9. 09-Jan-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 32/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Court Decision Summary The court dismissed the petitioner's application for remand of the original case (Crl.M.P. No. 32/2026). The court found that the complainant had already been cross-examined three times on dates 28.09.2022, 13.03.2023, and 02.05.2023 over approximately 30 hours, providing sufficient opportunity to raise questions about alleged financial transactions and income tax issues. The court reasoned that allowing further remand would be contrary to justice, especially since the case has been pending since 2019 for approximately seven years, and deemed the petition an abuse of process. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case