Sasikumar vs Selvam alias Muthusamy — 32/2026

Case under Code of Criminal Procedure Section reopen. Disposed: Uncontested--Dismissed on 05th March 2026.

CRLMP - Criminal Miscellaneous Petition

CNR: TNTI170000962026

Case disposed

Filing Number

96/2026

Filing Date

09-01-2026

Registration No

32/2026

Registration Date

09-01-2026

Court

Judicial Magistrate No. I Court, Udumalpet

Judge

3-Judicial Magistrate No. I, Udumalpet

Decision Date

05th March 2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--Dismissed

Acts & Sections

Code of Criminal Procedure Section reopen

Petitioner(s)

Sasikumar

Adv. Chidambarasamy C

Respondent(s)

Selvam alias Muthusamy

Hearing History

Judge: 3-Judicial Magistrate No. I, Udumalpet

05-03-2026

Disposed

20-02-2026

Orders

11-02-2026

Enquiry

03-02-2026

Enquiry

20-01-2026

Counter

Final Orders / Judgements

05-03-2026
Copy of Judgment

Court Decision Summary The court dismissed the petitioner's application for remand of the original case (Crl.M.P. No. 32/2026). The court found that the complainant had already been cross-examined three times on dates 28.09.2022, 13.03.2023, and 02.05.2023 over approximately 30 hours, providing sufficient opportunity to raise questions about alleged financial transactions and income tax issues. The court reasoned that allowing further remand would be contrary to justice, especially since the case has been pending since 2019 for approximately seven years, and deemed the petition an abuse of process. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Court Decision Summary The court dismissed the petitioner's application for remand of the original case (Crl.M.P. No. 32/2026). The court found that the complainant had already been cross-examined three times on dates 28.09.2022, 13.03.2023, and 02.05.2023 over approximately 30 hours, providing sufficient opportunity to raise questions about alleged financial transactions and income tax issues. The court reasoned that allowing further remand would be contrary to justice, especially since the case has been pending since 2019 for approximately seven years, and deemed the petition an abuse of process. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

More from this court

Judicial Magistrate No. I Court, Udumalpet All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case