R Prakash vs G Thangapandian — 197/2023
Case under Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 Section 166. Status: Evidence. Next hearing: 12th March 2026.
MCOP - Motor Accidents Claim Original Petition
CNR: TNTI160010452023
Next Hearing
12th March 2026
Filing Number
1076/2023
Filing Date
13-10-2023
Registration No
197/2023
Registration Date
22-12-2023
Court
Sub Court,Avinashi
Judge
3-Subordinate Judge, Avinashi
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
R Prakash
Adv. AYOOB RAJA
Respondent(s)
G Thangapandian
National Insurance Company Ltd.,
Hearing History
Judge: 3-Subordinate Judge, Avinashi
Evidence
Evidence
Counter
Counter
IA / EA Pending / CMP Pending / CRP Pending / CMA Pending
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 05-03-2026 | Evidence |
| 26-02-2026 | Evidence |
| 12-02-2026 | Counter |
| 29-01-2026 | Counter |
| 18-12-2025 | IA / EA Pending / CMP Pending / CRP Pending / CMA Pending |
Interim Orders
Summary This is a witness deposition (RW-1) in MCOP No. 197/2023 before the Subordinate Judge, Avinashi, recorded on March 5, 2026, in a motor vehicle accident case (dated July 17, 2023). The witness testified regarding a road traffic incident involving a Maruti vehicle (TN 43 D 2669) and gave cross-examination statements about the accident circumstances, vehicle condition, and indicator light usage. The deposition was recorded in open court, read over to the witness in the presence of the accused/pleader, and admitted as correct by the witness. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary This is a witness deposition (RW-1) in MCOP No. 197/2023 before the Subordinate Judge, Avinashi, recorded on March 5, 2026, in a motor vehicle accident case (dated July 17, 2023). The witness testified regarding a road traffic incident involving a Maruti vehicle (TN 43 D 2669) and gave cross-examination statements about the accident circumstances, vehicle condition, and indicator light usage. The deposition was recorded in open court, read over to the witness in the presence of the accused/pleader, and admitted as correct by the witness. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Explore other courts