Rukmani vs Jeyaprakash — 191/2022

Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section Or7R1. Disposed: Uncontested--Dismissed on 09th March 2026.

Case disposed

OS - Original Suit

CNR: TNTI160003872022

Filing Number

410/2022

Filing Date

20-Jun-2022

Registration No

191/2022

Registration Date

23-Jun-2022

Court

Sub Court,Avinashi

Judge

3-Subordinate Judge, Avinashi

Decision Date

09-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--Dismissed

Last updated 19-Apr-2026

Acts & Sections

Code of Civil Procedure Section Or7R1

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Rukmani

    Adv. Subramanian P

  2. 2.Moorthy

    Adv. Subramanian P

  3. 3.Lakshmi

    Adv. Subramanian P

  4. 4.Sithamparam

    Adv. Subramanian P

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Jeyaprakash

  2. 2.Gopalsamy

  3. 3.The Land Reforms Commissioner

  4. 4.The District Collector, Tiruppur

  5. 5.The Thasildhar, Avinashi

  6. 6.The Revenue Thasildhar

  7. 7.The Village Administrative Officer

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 09-Mar-2026

    JudgementView PDF

    The Subordinate Court of Avinashi dismissed a partition suit (Original Suit No. 191 of 2022) filed by Rukmani, Murthy, Lakshmi, and Chidambaram against JayaPrakash, Gopalsamy, and various government officials. The suit was dismissed for default because the plaintiffs failed to appear or provide representation during the final hearing on March 9, 2026, despite the case being posted for special hearing. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 09-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    Subordinate Judge, Avinashi

  4. 24-Feb-2026

    Trial

    Subordinate Judge, Avinashi

  5. 13-Jan-2026

    Trial

    Subordinate Judge, Avinashi

  6. 10-Dec-2025

    Trial

    Subordinate Judge, Avinashi

  7. 04-Nov-2025

    Trial

    Subordinate Judge, Avinashi

  8. 13-Oct-2025

    Trial

    Subordinate Judge, Avinashi

  9. 15-Sep-2025

    Trial

    Subordinate Judge, Avinashi

  10. 18-Aug-2025

    Trial

    Subordinate Judge, Avinashi

  11. 16-Jul-2025

    Trial

    Subordinate Judge, Avinashi

  12. 02-Jun-2025

    Trial

    Subordinate Judge, Avinashi

  13. 02-Apr-2025

    Trial

    Subordinate Judge, Avinashi

  14. 01-Mar-2025

    Trial

    Subordinate Judge, Avinashi

  15. 05-Feb-2025

    Trial

    Subordinate Judge, Avinashi

  16. 11-Dec-2024

    Trial

    Subordinate Judge, Avinashi

  17. 05-Nov-2024

    Trial

    Subordinate Judge, Avinashi

  18. 09-Sep-2024

    Trial

    Subordinate Judge, Avinashi

  19. 06-Aug-2024

    Trial

    Subordinate Judge, Avinashi

  20. 21-Jun-2024

    Trial

    Subordinate Judge, Avinashi

  21. 18-Mar-2024

    Trial

    Subordinate Judge, Avinashi

  22. 09-Jan-2024

    Trial

    Subordinate Judge, Avinashi

  23. 06-Dec-2023

    Trial

    Subordinate Judge, Avinashi

  24. 02-Nov-2023

    Trial

    Subordinate Judge, Avinashi

  25. 14-Sep-2023

    Trial

    Subordinate Judge, Avinashi

  26. 07-Sep-2023

    Trial

    Subordinate Judge, Avinashi

  27. 21-Jul-2023

    Written Statement

    Subordinate Judge, Avinashi

  28. 24-Apr-2023

    Written Statement

    Subordinate Judge, Avinashi

  29. 15-Feb-2023

    Written Statement

    Subordinate Judge, Avinashi

  30. 14-Dec-2022

    Written Statement

    Subordinate Judge, Avinashi

  31. 14-Oct-2022

    Written Statement

    Subordinate Judge, Avinashi

  32. 04-Aug-2022

    Written Statement

    Subordinate Judge, Avinashi

  33. 23-Jun-2022

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  34. 20-Jun-2022

    Case filed

    Registration No. 191/2022

casestatus.in Summary

The Subordinate Court of Avinashi dismissed a partition suit (Original Suit No. 191 of 2022) filed by Rukmani, Murthy, Lakshmi, and Chidambaram against JayaPrakash, Gopalsamy, and various government officials. The suit was dismissed for default because the plaintiffs failed to appear or provide representation during the final hearing on March 9, 2026, despite the case being posted for special hearing. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case