Gowri vs Karthickkumar — 15/2022

Case under Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 Section S166. Status: Evidence. Next hearing: 12th March 2026.

Evidence Next hearing 12-Mar-2026

MCOP - Motor Accidents Claim Original Petition

CNR: TNTI160003502022

Filing Number

377/2022

Filing Date

08-Jun-2022

Registration No

15/2022

Registration Date

28-Jun-2022

Court

Sub Court,Avinashi

Judge

3-Subordinate Judge, Avinashi

Last updated 12-Mar-2026

Acts & Sections

Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 Section S166

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Gowri

    Adv. Kanagaraju R P

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Karthickkumar

  2. 2.Krishnaveni

  3. 3.United India Insurance Company Limitted

Case History

  1. 12-Mar-2026

    Next hearingPending

  2. 05-Mar-2026

    Evidence

    Subordinate Judge, Avinashi

  3. 26-Feb-2026

    Evidence

    Subordinate Judge, Avinashi

  4. 12-Feb-2026

    Evidence

    Subordinate Judge, Avinashi

  5. 29-Jan-2026

    Evidence

    Subordinate Judge, Avinashi

  6. 11-Dec-2025

    Evidence

    Subordinate Judge, Avinashi

  7. 04-Dec-2025

    Evidence

    Subordinate Judge, Avinashi

  8. 13-Nov-2025

    Evidence

    Subordinate Judge, Avinashi

  9. 30-Oct-2025

    Evidence

    Subordinate Judge, Avinashi

  10. 16-Oct-2025

    Evidence

    Subordinate Judge, Avinashi

  11. 25-Sep-2025

    Evidence

    Subordinate Judge, Avinashi

  12. 28-Aug-2025

    Evidence

    Subordinate Judge, Avinashi

  13. 14-Aug-2025

    Deposition copyView PDF

    This is a witness deposition (PW-2) recorded before the Subordinate Judge, Avinashi on August 14, 2025, in case MCOP No. 15/2022. The witness was sworn in under the Oaths Act, 1969, and testified regarding the petitioner's employment and income details, with examination and cross-examination conducted by the respective parties. The deposition was read over and admitted by the witness as correct, with no re-examination required. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  14. 14-Aug-2025

    Evidence

    Subordinate Judge, Avinashi

  15. 24-Jul-2025

    Evidence

    Subordinate Judge, Avinashi

  16. 10-Jul-2025

    Deposition copyView PDF

  17. 10-Jul-2025

    Evidence

    Subordinate Judge, Avinashi

  18. 12-Jun-2025

    Deposition copyView PDF

  19. 12-Jun-2025

    Evidence

    Subordinate Judge, Avinashi

  20. 06-Mar-2025

    Enquiry

    Subordinate Judge, Avinashi

  21. 10-Jan-2025

    Enquiry

    Subordinate Judge, Avinashi

  22. 21-Nov-2024

    Enquiry

    Subordinate Judge, Avinashi

  23. 27-Sep-2024

    Enquiry

    Subordinate Judge, Avinashi

  24. 09-Sep-2024

    Enquiry

    Subordinate Judge, Avinashi

  25. 02-Aug-2024

    Appearance

    Subordinate Judge, Avinashi

  26. 15-Jul-2024

    Enquiry

    Subordinate Judge, Avinashi

  27. 16-Apr-2024

    Issue of Service

    Subordinate Judge, Avinashi

  28. 21-Feb-2024

    Issue of Service

    Subordinate Judge, Avinashi

  29. 11-Dec-2023

    Issue of Service

    Subordinate Judge, Avinashi

  30. 04-Oct-2023

    Issue of Service

    Subordinate Judge, Avinashi

  31. 19-Jul-2023

    Issue of Service

    Subordinate Judge, Avinashi

  32. 20-Apr-2023

    Issue of Service

    Subordinate Judge, Avinashi

  33. 16-Feb-2023

    Issue of Service

    Subordinate Judge, Avinashi

  34. 16-Dec-2022

    Issue of Service

    Subordinate Judge, Avinashi

  35. 17-Oct-2022

    Issue of Service

    Subordinate Judge, Avinashi

  36. 15-Oct-2022

    Issue of Service

    Subordinate Judge, Avinashi

  37. 04-Aug-2022

    Issue of Service

    Subordinate Judge, Avinashi

  38. 28-Jun-2022

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  39. 08-Jun-2022

    Case filed

    Registration No. 15/2022

casestatus.in Summary

This is a witness deposition (PW-2) recorded before the Subordinate Judge, Avinashi on August 14, 2025, in case MCOP No. 15/2022. The witness was sworn in under the Oaths Act, 1969, and testified regarding the petitioner's employment and income details, with examination and cross-examination conducted by the respective parties. The deposition was read over and admitted by the witness as correct, with no re-examination required. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case