P.Sathish Kumar vs Kalamani — 98/2022

Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section Or7R1. Status: Evidence. Next hearing: 01st June 2026.

Evidence Next hearing 01-Jun-2026

OS - Original Suit

CNR: TNTI160002082022

Filing Number

239/2022

Filing Date

18-Apr-2022

Registration No

98/2022

Registration Date

22-Apr-2022

Court

Sub Court,Avinashi

Judge

3-Subordinate Judge, Avinashi

Last updated 19-Apr-2026

Acts & Sections

Code of Civil Procedure Section Or7R1

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.P.Sathish Kumar

    Adv. Rangasamy A R

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Kalamani

Case History

  1. 01-Jun-2026

    Next hearingPending

  2. 15-Apr-2026

    Deposition copyView PDF

    Case Summary: OS – 98/2022, Subordinate Court, Avinashi, dated 15.04.2026. The court recorded witness testimony (PW1 – Sathish) regarding a property dispute involving 4.85 acres of land in Survey No. 240. The court found that the petition is not maintainable because the plaintiff failed to implead approximately 80 co-owners of the joint property as necessary parties to the suit, and accordingly dismissed the petition (Thaava Nillukattakam) for non-joinder of essential parties. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 15-Apr-2026

    Evidence

    Subordinate Judge, Avinashi

  4. 23-Mar-2026

    Evidence

    Subordinate Judge, Avinashi

  5. 09-Mar-2026

    Deposition copyView PDF

  6. 09-Mar-2026

    Evidence

    Subordinate Judge, Avinashi

  7. 04-Mar-2026

    Trial

    Subordinate Judge, Avinashi

  8. 07-Feb-2026

    Trial

    Subordinate Judge, Avinashi

  9. 03-Jan-2026

    Trial

    Subordinate Judge, Avinashi

  10. 06-Dec-2025

    Issues

    Subordinate Judge, Avinashi

  11. 25-Oct-2025

    Issues

    Subordinate Judge, Avinashi

  12. 20-Sep-2025

    Issues

    Subordinate Judge, Avinashi

  13. 05-Aug-2025

    Issues

    Subordinate Judge, Avinashi

  14. 16-Jun-2025

    Issues

    Subordinate Judge, Avinashi

  15. 17-Mar-2025

    Issues

    Subordinate Judge, Avinashi

  16. 26-Feb-2025

    Issues

    Subordinate Judge, Avinashi

  17. 18-Dec-2024

    IA / Ea Pending / Cmp Pending / CRP Pending / Cma Pending

    Subordinate Judge, Avinashi

  18. 27-Nov-2024

    IA / Ea Pending / Cmp Pending / CRP Pending / Cma Pending

    Subordinate Judge, Avinashi

  19. 30-Sep-2024

    IA / Ea Pending / Cmp Pending / CRP Pending / Cma Pending

    Subordinate Judge, Avinashi

  20. 30-Aug-2024

    IA / Ea Pending / Cmp Pending / CRP Pending / Cma Pending

    Subordinate Judge, Avinashi

  21. 19-Jul-2024

    Written Statement

    Subordinate Judge, Avinashi

  22. 16-Jul-2024

    Written Statement

    Subordinate Judge, Avinashi

  23. 17-Apr-2024

    Written Statement

    Subordinate Judge, Avinashi

  24. 05-Mar-2024

    Written Statement

    Subordinate Judge, Avinashi

  25. 03-Feb-2024

    IA / Ea Pending / Cmp Pending / CRP Pending / Cma Pending

    Subordinate Judge, Avinashi

  26. 20-Nov-2023

    IA / Ea Pending / Cmp Pending / CRP Pending / Cma Pending

    Subordinate Judge, Avinashi

  27. 16-Oct-2023

    IA / Ea Pending / Cmp Pending / CRP Pending / Cma Pending

    Subordinate Judge, Avinashi

  28. 23-Aug-2023

    IA / Ea Pending / Cmp Pending / CRP Pending / Cma Pending

    Subordinate Judge, Avinashi

  29. 08-Aug-2023

    Written Statement

    Subordinate Judge, Avinashi

  30. 06-Jun-2023

    Written Statement

    Subordinate Judge, Avinashi

  31. 21-Feb-2023

    Written Statement

    Subordinate Judge, Avinashi

  32. 20-Dec-2022

    Issue of Service

    Subordinate Judge, Avinashi

  33. 19-Oct-2022

    Issue of Service

    Subordinate Judge, Avinashi

  34. 12-Aug-2022

    Issue of Service

    Subordinate Judge, Avinashi

  35. 23-Jun-2022

    Issue of Service

    Subordinate Judge, Avinashi

  36. 22-Apr-2022

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  37. 18-Apr-2022

    Case filed

    Registration No. 98/2022

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: OS – 98/2022, Subordinate Court, Avinashi, dated 15.04.2026. The court recorded witness testimony (PW1 – Sathish) regarding a property dispute involving 4.85 acres of land in Survey No. 240. The court found that the petition is not maintainable because the plaintiff failed to implead approximately 80 co-owners of the joint property as necessary parties to the suit, and accordingly dismissed the petition (Thaava Nillukattakam) for non-joinder of essential parties. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case