SSI OF POLICE VELLAKOVIL PS vs KARTHIKEYAN — 751/2025

Case under Lotteries Regulation Act, 1998 Section 5,7(3). Disposed: Uncontested--Judgement on admission on 09th March 2026.

Case disposed

STC - Small Cause Calendar case / Summary Trial Case

CNR: TNTI150024852025

e-Filing Number

23-07-2025

Filing Number

2475/2025

Filing Date

28-Jul-2025

Registration No

751/2025

Registration Date

29-Jul-2025

Court

Judicial Magistrate Court, Kangeyam

Judge

2-Judicial Magistrate

Decision Date

09-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--Judgement on admission

Last updated 12-Mar-2026

Acts & Sections

Lotteries Regulation Act, 1998 Section 5,7(3)

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.SSI OF POLICE VELLAKOVIL PS (Police Station)

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.KARTHIKEYAN

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 09-Mar-2026

    Copy of JudgmentView PDF

    The Judicial Magistrate Court in Kangayam convicted accused Karthikeyan under Sections 5 and 7(3) of the Liquor Act (LR Act) after he pleaded guilty to the charges. The court found his admission clear and unqualified, constituting the alleged offense. He was sentenced to a fine of Rs. 2,000 with one week simple imprisonment as default punishment. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 09-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    Judicial Magistrate

  4. 05-Mar-2026

    Issue of Service

    Judicial Magistrate

  5. 04-Feb-2026

    Issue of Service

    Judicial Magistrate

  6. 12-Dec-2025

    Issue of Service

    Judicial Magistrate

  7. 30-Oct-2025

    Issue of Service

    Judicial Magistrate

  8. 01-Sep-2025

    Issue of Service

    Judicial Magistrate

  9. 29-Jul-2025

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  10. 28-Jul-2025

    Case filed

    Registration No. 751/2025

casestatus.in Summary

The Judicial Magistrate Court in Kangayam convicted accused Karthikeyan under Sections 5 and 7(3) of the Liquor Act (LR Act) after he pleaded guilty to the charges. The court found his admission clear and unqualified, constituting the alleged offense. He was sentenced to a fine of Rs. 2,000 with one week simple imprisonment as default punishment. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case