Balamurugan vs Inspector of Police, Kangayam PS — 106/2026

Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 480 BNSS. Disposed: Contested--Allowed on 07th March 2026.

Case disposed

CRLMP - Criminal Miscellaneous Petition

CNR: TNTI150004852026

e-Filing Number

02-03-2026

Filing Number

472/2026

Filing Date

02-Mar-2026

Registration No

106/2026

Registration Date

02-Mar-2026

Court

Judicial Magistrate Court, Kangeyam

Judge

2-Judicial Magistrate

Decision Date

07-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--Allowed

Last updated 12-Mar-2026

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 480 BNSS

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Balamurugan

    Adv. Vadivelsamy Vadivelsamy

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Inspector of Police, Kangayam PS (Police Station)

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 07-Mar-2026

    Copy of JudgmentView PDF

    The Judicial Magistrate Court at Kangayam granted bail to accused Balamurugan, charged under BNS sections 296(b), 115(2), 118(1), and 351(3). The court found that despite the prosecution's concerns about evidence tampering, the accused had no criminal history, strong community ties, and had already spent 7 days in custody, making further detention unnecessary. Bail was granted on conditions including a Rs. 10,000 bond with two blood relative sureties, weekly court appearances, and cooperation with investigation. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 07-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    Judicial Magistrate

  4. 05-Mar-2026

    Issue of Service

    Judicial Magistrate

  5. 02-Mar-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  6. 02-Mar-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 106/2026

casestatus.in Summary

The Judicial Magistrate Court at Kangayam granted bail to accused Balamurugan, charged under BNS sections 296(b), 115(2), 118(1), and 351(3). The court found that despite the prosecution's concerns about evidence tampering, the accused had no criminal history, strong community ties, and had already spent 7 days in custody, making further detention unnecessary. Bail was granted on conditions including a Rs. 10,000 bond with two blood relative sureties, weekly court appearances, and cooperation with investigation. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case