Ashok vs SI of police Kangayam — 105/2026

Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 480. Disposed: Contested--Allowed on 09th March 2026.

Case disposed

CRLMP - Criminal Miscellaneous Petition

CNR: TNTI150004822026

Filing Number

469/2026

Filing Date

26-Feb-2026

Registration No

105/2026

Registration Date

26-Feb-2026

Court

Judicial Magistrate Court, Kangeyam

Judge

2-Judicial Magistrate

Decision Date

09-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--Allowed

Last updated 12-Mar-2026

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 480

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Ashok

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.SI of police Kangayam

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 09-Mar-2026

    Copy of JudgmentView PDF

    The Judicial Magistrate Court of Kangayam granted bail to accused Ashok, charged under Section 394 IPC (theft), after he had been in judicial custody for 123 days. The court found no criminal antecedents, strong community roots, and sufficient evidence collected, warranting his release despite prosecution concerns about evidence tampering. Bail was granted with conditions including Rs. 10,000 bond with two blood relative sureties, daily court appearance, and cooperation with investigation. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 09-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    Judicial Magistrate

  4. 05-Mar-2026

    Orders

    Judicial Magistrate

  5. 02-Mar-2026

    Enquiry

    Judicial Magistrate

  6. 26-Feb-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  7. 26-Feb-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 105/2026

casestatus.in Summary

The Judicial Magistrate Court of Kangayam granted bail to accused Ashok, charged under Section 394 IPC (theft), after he had been in judicial custody for 123 days. The court found no criminal antecedents, strong community roots, and sufficient evidence collected, warranting his release despite prosecution concerns about evidence tampering. Bail was granted with conditions including Rs. 10,000 bond with two blood relative sureties, daily court appearance, and cooperation with investigation. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case