Si Of Police Vellakovil Ps vs KESAVAN — 154/2026

Case under Cigarette and Other Tobacco Products Acts 2003 Section 6(a),24(1). Disposed: Uncontested--Judgement on admission on 09th March 2026.

Case disposedSub Stage

STC - Small Cause Calendar case / Summary Trial Case

CNR: TNTI150004452026

e-Filing Number

21-02-2026

Filing Number

432/2026

Filing Date

24-Feb-2026

Registration No

154/2026

Registration Date

24-Feb-2026

Court

Judicial Magistrate Court, Kangeyam

Judge

2-Judicial Magistrate

Decision Date

09-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--Judgement on admission

Last updated 19-Apr-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

62

Police Station

Vellakovil Police Station

Year

2026

Acts & Sections

Cigarette and Other Tobacco Products Acts 2003 Section 6(a),24(1)

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Si Of Police Vellakovil Ps (Police Station)

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.KESAVAN

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 09-Mar-2026

    Copy of JudgmentView PDF

    The Judicial Magistrate Court, Kangayam convicted the accused Kesavan under Section 6(a) read with Section 24(1) of the Cigarettes and Other Tobacco Products (Prohibition of Advertisement and Regulation of Trade and Commerce, Production, Supply and Distribution) Act (COTPA). The accused voluntarily pleaded guilty to the charges. He was sentenced to pay a fine of Rs. 200, with a default provision of simple imprisonment for 1 week. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 09-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    Judicial Magistrate

  4. 24-Feb-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  5. 24-Feb-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 154/2026

casestatus.in Summary

The Judicial Magistrate Court, Kangayam convicted the accused Kesavan under Section 6(a) read with Section 24(1) of the Cigarettes and Other Tobacco Products (Prohibition of Advertisement and Regulation of Trade and Commerce, Production, Supply and Distribution) Act (COTPA). The accused voluntarily pleaded guilty to the charges. He was sentenced to pay a fine of Rs. 200, with a default provision of simple imprisonment for 1 week. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case