Palanisamy vs Inspector of police Kangayam — 90/2026

Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 452. Disposed: Contested--Allowed on 12th March 2026.

Case disposed

CRLMP - Criminal Miscellaneous Petition

CNR: TNTI150004332026

Filing Number

420/2026

Filing Date

20-Feb-2026

Registration No

90/2026

Registration Date

20-Feb-2026

Court

Judicial Magistrate Court, Kangeyam

Judge

2-Judicial Magistrate

Decision Date

12-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--Allowed

Last updated 19-Apr-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

509

Police Station

Kangayam Police Station

Year

2008

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 452

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Palanisamy

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Inspector of police Kangayam

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 12-Mar-2026

    Copy of JudgmentView PDF

    Summary The Criminal Court at Kangeyam allowed the petition (Crl.MP.No. 90/2026) and ordered the release of the vehicle registration certificate (TCE1011) from court custody to the petitioner/owner. The court relied on the Supreme Court precedent in Sunderbhai Ambalal v. State of Gujarat, which establishes that seized vehicle documents should be returned to their rightful owners once the underlying criminal case concludes, provided the documents belong to the petitioner as registered owner. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 12-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    Judicial Magistrate

  4. 09-Mar-2026

    Orders

    Judicial Magistrate

  5. 06-Mar-2026

    Issue of Service

    Judicial Magistrate

  6. 03-Mar-2026

    Issue of Service

    Judicial Magistrate

  7. 27-Feb-2026

    Issue of Service

    Judicial Magistrate

  8. 25-Feb-2026

    Issue of Service

    Judicial Magistrate

  9. 23-Feb-2026

    Issue of Service

    Judicial Magistrate

  10. 20-Feb-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  11. 20-Feb-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 90/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Summary The Criminal Court at Kangeyam allowed the petition (Crl.MP.No. 90/2026) and ordered the release of the vehicle registration certificate (TCE1011) from court custody to the petitioner/owner. The court relied on the Supreme Court precedent in Sunderbhai Ambalal v. State of Gujarat, which establishes that seized vehicle documents should be returned to their rightful owners once the underlying criminal case concludes, provided the documents belong to the petitioner as registered owner. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case