SI Of Police Kangeyam Ps vs Prabhu — 148/2026

Case under Tn Gaming Act, 1930 Section 12. Disposed: Uncontested--Judgement on admission on 09th March 2026.

Case disposed

STC - Small Cause Calendar case / Summary Trial Case

CNR: TNTI150004172026

e-Filing Number

17-02-2026

Filing Number

405/2026

Filing Date

20-Feb-2026

Registration No

148/2026

Registration Date

20-Feb-2026

Court

Judicial Magistrate Court, Kangeyam

Judge

2-Judicial Magistrate

Decision Date

09-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--Judgement on admission

Last updated 19-Apr-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

899

Police Station

Kangayam Police Station

Year

2025

Acts & Sections

Tn Gaming Act, 1930 Section 12

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.SI Of Police Kangeyam Ps (Police Station)

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Prabhu

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 09-Mar-2026

    Copy of JudgmentView PDF

    Summary: The Judicial Magistrate Court, Kangayam convicted nine accused (A1-A9) of cockfighting under Section 12 of the Tamil Nadu Prevention of Cruelty to Animals Act. All accused voluntarily admitted guilt and were sentenced to pay Rs. 1,000 fine each (total Rs. 9,000) with default imprisonment of one week. The court also confiscated Rs. 6,196 cash to the state and ordered return of certain seized property to its owner. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 09-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    Judicial Magistrate

  4. 27-Feb-2026

    Issue of Service

    Judicial Magistrate

  5. 27-Feb-2026

    Issue of Service

    Judicial Magistrate

  6. 20-Feb-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  7. 20-Feb-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 148/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Summary: The Judicial Magistrate Court, Kangayam convicted nine accused (A1-A9) of cockfighting under Section 12 of the Tamil Nadu Prevention of Cruelty to Animals Act. All accused voluntarily admitted guilt and were sentenced to pay Rs. 1,000 fine each (total Rs. 9,000) with default imprisonment of one week. The court also confiscated Rs. 6,196 cash to the state and ordered return of certain seized property to its owner. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case