Si Of Police Vellakovil Ps vs KARTHIK AND 2 OTHERS — 130/2026

Case under Tn Gaming Act, 1930 Section 12. Disposed: Uncontested--Judgement on admission on 09th March 2026.

Case disposed

STC - Small Cause Calendar case / Summary Trial Case

CNR: TNTI150003582026

e-Filing Number

13-02-2026

Filing Number

346/2026

Filing Date

17-Feb-2026

Registration No

130/2026

Registration Date

17-Feb-2026

Court

Judicial Magistrate Court, Kangeyam

Judge

2-Judicial Magistrate

Decision Date

09-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--Judgement on admission

Last updated 19-Apr-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

35

Police Station

Vellakovil Police Station

Year

2026

Acts & Sections

Tn Gaming Act, 1930 Section 12

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Si Of Police Vellakovil Ps (Police Station)

    Adv. INSPECTOR OF POLICE VELLAKOIL POLICE STATION

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.KARTHIK AND 2 OTHERS

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 09-Mar-2026

    Copy of JudgmentView PDF

    The Judicial Magistrate Court, Kangayam convicted three accused (Karthik and 2 others) under Section 12 of the TNG Act after they voluntarily admitted to the charges. Each accused was sentenced to pay Rs. 1,000 fine (totaling Rs. 3,000) with one week simple imprisonment in default. Additionally, certain seized items were ordered destroyed, Rs. 3,740 confiscated to the state, and remaining property returned to its owner. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 09-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    Judicial Magistrate

  4. 17-Feb-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  5. 17-Feb-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 130/2026

casestatus.in Summary

The Judicial Magistrate Court, Kangayam convicted three accused (Karthik and 2 others) under Section 12 of the TNG Act after they voluntarily admitted to the charges. Each accused was sentenced to pay Rs. 1,000 fine (totaling Rs. 3,000) with one week simple imprisonment in default. Additionally, certain seized items were ordered destroyed, Rs. 3,740 confiscated to the state, and remaining property returned to its owner. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case